In this comparison, Citroën ë-C4 X leads on family practicality, charging speed and running costs, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on value for money.
Choose the Citroën ë-C4 X (2023-2024) if...
Choose the Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) if...
Our take
The Citroën ë-C4 X leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
iV 60
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £31,995 (better) | £33,450 |
| Official range | 222 miles | 249 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 510 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 10.8 sec | 8.7 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,649 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,800 mm (better) | 1,879 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,525 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 600 mm spare (better) | 521 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 510 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1710 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,200 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Citroën ë-C4 X
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Citroën ë-C4 X 50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda Enyaq iV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.60m | 4.65m+49mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.88m+79mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.15m |
| Height | 1.52m | 1.62m+95mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.67m | 2.77m+95mm |
| Ground Clearance | 156mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 510L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1710L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,580kg (better) | 1,924kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,200kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 50kWh | 62kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 222 mi | 249 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 120kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £31,995 (better) | £33,450 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2023–2024 | 2021–2024 |
* Skoda Enyaq: Rapid charging depends on the build: early 2021 cars had 50 kW as standard with 100 kW (60) or 125 kW (80) optional; later cars 120 kW (60), 135 kW (80, 85) or 175 kW (2024 85x and vRS). Many adverts state it, e.g. "DC135kW".
* Skoda Enyaq: Latest WLTP figure for this version; earlier builds were rated slightly lower.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 222 miles | 249 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 185 miles | 208 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 120 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.4 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 46 kWh | 58 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 10.8 sec | 8.7 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW | 132 kW (better) |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 310 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £14,637 | £14,300 |
| Average used price | £14,900 | £17,770 |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Citroën ë-C4 X
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Citroën ë-C4 X
No active listings.
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq costs £1,455 more than the Citroën ë-C4 X. For that premium it adds 27 miles more WLTP range, 75 litres more boot space and 32 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Citroën ë-C4 X comes out ahead overall.
The Citroën ë-C4 X is £1,455 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Citroën ë-C4 X comes out roughly £1,535 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 185 miles for the Citroën ë-C4 X and 208 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 22 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-25 minutes.
The Citroën ë-C4 X is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 79 mm narrower than the Skoda Enyaq. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-C4 X and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Citroën ë-C4 X comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideBuying a used Citroën ë-C4 or ë-C4 X: the 50 and 54 kWh versions, the recalls to check, realistic range, what owners report and what to pay in 2026.
A used Skoda Enyaq buyer’s guide: 60 vs 80 vs 80x vs vRS vs the 2024 85, the slow-charging trap on early cars, heat pump or not, battery warranty, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .