Loading comparison
Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) vs Toyota C-HR+
Selected trimStandard RangeChange trim283 mi · 58 kWh · £34,495
At a glance
In this comparison, Skoda Enyaq leads on family practicality and city driving, while the Toyota C-HR+ leads on running costs.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) if...
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
- you drive in the city - it's compact with an excellent turning circle
Choose the Toyota C-HR+ if...
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.7p per mile on off-peak electricity
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Value
Skoda
6.5
Toyota
6.3
Too close to call
Motorway Range
Skoda
4.9
Toyota
5
Too close to call
FamilySkoda
Skoda
8.1
Toyota
6.6
Charging
Skoda
4.8
Toyota
4.4
Too close to call
Cost Per MileToyota
Skoda
4.9
Toyota
9.1
City DrivingSkoda
Skoda
6.2
Toyota
5.1
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,450 (better) | £34,495 |
| Official range | 249 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 585 L (better) | 416 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 24 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.7 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
Length
Skoda Enyaq4,649mm
Toyota C-HR+4,520mm-129mm
Width
Skoda Enyaq1,879mm
Toyota C-HR+1,870mm-9mm
Height
Skoda Enyaq1,620mm
Toyota C-HR+1,595mm-25mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,649 mm | 4,520 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,879 mm | 1,870 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,148 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,595 mm |
| Turning circle | 9.3 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 521 mm spare | 530 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 585 L (better) | 416 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1710 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 0 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,200 kg | Not available |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Skoda Enyaq
- Boot space of 585 L is bigger than 85% of SUVs we track.
- 9.3 m turning circle, tighter than 100% of SUVs in our database.
Toyota C-HR+
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Skoda Enyaq iV 60 |  Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.65m | 4.52m-129mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.87m-9mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.15m | Not available |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.59m-25mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.75m-15mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 185mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 585L (better) | 416L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1710L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 9.3m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,924kg | 1,828kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,200kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 62kWh (better) | 58kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 249 mi | 283 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 120kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,450 (better) | £34,495 |
| Price after EV grant | £33,450 (not eligible) | £32,995 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2024 | 2026+ |
* Skoda Enyaq: Rapid charging depends on the build: early 2021 cars had 50 kW as standard with 100 kW (60) or 125 kW (80) optional; later cars 120 kW (60), 135 kW (80, 85) or 175 kW (2024 85x and vRS). Many adverts state it, e.g. "DC135kW".
* Skoda Enyaq: Latest WLTP figure for this version; earlier builds were rated slightly lower.
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 249 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 208 miles | 235 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 24 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 120 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | Not available | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.7 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
| Power | 132 kW (better) | 123 kW |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 269 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Skoda Enyaq
iV 60
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Toyota C-HR+
Standard Range
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Skoda Enyaq iV 60
Tested 2021
Adult Occupant94%
Child Occupant89%
Vulnerable Road Users71%
Safety Assist82%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant85%
Child Occupant86%
Vulnerable Road Users86%
Safety Assist79%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
Skoda Enyaq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Toyota C-HR+
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Skoda Enyaq
- £18,8072023Car360View
- £19,6702023Anchor CarsView
- £14,9952021Drive GreenView
Toyota C-HR+
No active listings.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Toyota C-HR+ worth the extra £1,045 over the Skoda Enyaq?
The Toyota C-HR+ costs £1,045 more than the Skoda Enyaq. For that premium it adds 34 miles more WLTP range and 30 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Skoda Enyaq is not just cheaper - it also offers 169 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Skoda Enyaq or the Toyota C-HR+?
The Skoda Enyaq is £1,045 cheaper to buy. The Toyota C-HR+ is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £168 for the Skoda Enyaq, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £885 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 208 miles for the Skoda Enyaq and 235 miles for the Toyota C-HR+ - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota C-HR+ goes roughly 28 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-30 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Skoda Enyaq or the Toyota C-HR+?
The two are within 9 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 530 mm of total clearance for the Toyota C-HR+ and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
More Toyota C-HR+ comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best family EVsWhere the Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best city EVsWhere the Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the cheapest EVs to run
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .