In this comparison, BMW i4 leads on value for money and running costs, while the Volvo EC40 leads on charging speed and city driving.
Choose the BMW i4 if...
Choose the Volvo EC40 if...
Our take
The Volvo EC40 edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
eDrive40 M Sport
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | BMW i4eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £53,405 | £46,860 (better) |
| Official range | 367 miles (better) | 300 miles |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 404 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 31 min | 26 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 5.7 sec (better) | 7.3 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | BMW i4eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,783 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,852 mm (better) | 1,873 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,073 mm | 2,034 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,448 mm | 1,591 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.5 m | 11 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 548 mm spare (better) | 527 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | BMW i4eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 917 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 4 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 404 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1290 L | 1310 L (better) |
| Frunk | 0 L | 31 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,600 kg (better) | 1,500 kg |
| Specification | BMW i4 eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo EC40 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.78m | 4.44m-343mm |
| Width | 1.85m | 1.87m+21mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.07m | 2.03m-39mm |
| Height | 1.45m | 1.59m+143mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.86m | 2.70m-154mm |
| Ground Clearance | 125mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 404L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1290L | 1310L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 31L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 917mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 12.5m | 11m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,125kg | 2,065kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,600kg (better) | 1,500kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 83.9kWh (better) | 70kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 367 mi (better) | 300 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 200kW | 200kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £53,405 | £46,860 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Saloon | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2026 | 2024+ |
* BMW i4: Launch figures. Cars built from July 2024 (facelift) have 81.3 kWh usable, 205 kW DC charging and up to 373 miles WLTP.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | BMW i4eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 367 miles (better) | 300 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 261 miles (better) | 206 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 31 min | 26 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 200 kW | 200 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 160 Wh/km (better) | 167 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 80.7 kWh (better) | 70 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | BMW i4eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 5.7 sec (better) | 7.3 sec |
| Power | 250 kW (better) | 175 kW |
| Torque | 430 Nm (better) | 420 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

BMW i4
eDrive40 M Sport
8.8/10
average across 6 reviews

Volvo EC40
Single Motor
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | BMW i4eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
BMW i4
Volvo EC40
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
BMW i4
Volvo EC40
No active listings.
The BMW i4 costs £6,545 more than the Volvo EC40. For that premium it adds 67 miles more WLTP range, 66 litres more boot space and 75 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Volvo EC40 comes out ahead overall.
The Volvo EC40 is £6,545 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Volvo EC40 comes out roughly £6,505 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 261 miles for the BMW i4 and 206 miles for the Volvo EC40 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The BMW i4 goes roughly 55 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-31 minutes.
The two are within 21 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 548 mm of total clearance for the BMW i4 and about 527 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EC40. The Volvo EC40 also turns in a 1.5 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the BMW i4 and 84% for the Volvo EC40. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BMW i4 comparisons
More Volvo EC40 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used BMW i4 buyer’s guide: eDrive35, eDrive40, M50 and M60 compared, the battery recalls on early cars, warranty left, real-world and winter range, rear space, tyres, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Volvo EX40 and EC40 buyer’s guide: Single Motor, Extended Range and Twin Motor compared, real-world range, warranty left, the B-mode braking recall, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .