In this comparison, Audi Q4 e-tron leads on family practicality, running costs and city driving, while the Volvo EC40 leads on charging speed.
Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron (2021-2023) if...
Choose the Volvo EC40 if...
Our take
The Audi Q4 e-tron leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Single Motor
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £40,750 (better) | £46,860 |
| Official range | 221 miles | 300 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 520 L (better) | 404 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 26 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 7.3 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm (better) | 1,873 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm | 2,034 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,632 mm | 1,591 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare (better) | 527 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 917 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 4 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L (better) | 404 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1490 L (better) | 1310 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,500 kg |
| Specification | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 e-tron | Volvo EC40 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.44m-148mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.87m+8mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | 2.03m-74mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.59m-41mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.70m-62mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L (better) | 404L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1490L (better) | 1310L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 917mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | Not available | 2,065kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,500kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 55kWh | 70kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 221 mi | 300 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 200kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £40,750 (better) | £46,860 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2023 | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 221 miles | 300 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 184 miles | 206 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 26 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 200 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.2 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 167 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 52 kWh | 70 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 7.3 sec (better) |
| Power | 125 kW | 175 kW (better) |
| Torque | Not available | 420 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Audi Q4 e-tron
35 e-tron
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Volvo EC40
Single Motor
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EC40
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EC40
No active listings.
The Volvo EC40 costs £6,110 more than the Audi Q4 e-tron. For that premium it adds 79 miles more WLTP range, 100 kW faster peak rapid charging and 50 kW more power. The Audi Q4 e-tron is not just cheaper - it also offers 116 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi Q4 e-tron comes out ahead overall.
The Audi Q4 e-tron is £6,110 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Audi Q4 e-tron comes out roughly £6,190 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 184 miles for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 206 miles for the Volvo EC40 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Volvo EC40 goes roughly 22 miles further between charging stops.
The two are within 8 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 e-tron and about 527 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EC40. The Audi Q4 e-tron also turns in a 0.8 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 84% for the Volvo EC40. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 e-tron comparisons
More Volvo EC40 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi Q4 e-tron buyer’s guide: every version and battery explained, the 2021-2023 cars vs the 2024 update, the brake-software recall, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay, used vs new, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Volvo EX40 and EC40 buyer’s guide: Single Motor, Extended Range and Twin Motor compared, real-world range, warranty left, the B-mode braking recall, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .