Loading comparison
Audi Q4 e-tron (2021-2023) vs Skoda Enyaq
Selected trim35 e-tron · 2021-23Change trim221 mi · 55 kWh · £40,750
At a glance
In this comparison, Audi Q4 e-tron stays competitive across the board, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 2p per mile on off-peak electricity
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
ValueSkoda
Audi
5.1
Skoda
6.3
Motorway RangeSkoda
Audi
3.7
Skoda
5.3
Family
Audi
7.7
Skoda
8
Too close to call
ChargingSkoda
Audi
2
Skoda
6.3
Cost Per MileSkoda
Audi
4.8
Skoda
6.5
City Driving
Audi
6
Skoda
5.9
Too close to call
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
- £1,740 cheaper
- 48 miles more WLTP range
- 65 litres more boot space
- 65 kW faster rapid charging
- 0.9s quicker 0-62 mph
- 0.9 m tighter turning circle
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £40,750 | £39,010 (better) |
| Official range | 221 miles | 269 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 520 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 8.1 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
Length
Audi Q4 e-tron4,588mm-70mm
Skoda Enyaq4,658mm
Width
Audi Q4 e-tron1,865mm-14mm
Skoda Enyaq1,879mm
Height
Audi Q4 e-tron1,632mm
Skoda Enyaq1,622mm-10mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm (better) | 1,879 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,632 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare (better) | 521 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1490 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,000 kg |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
- Boot space of 585 L is bigger than 85% of SUVs we track.
- 9.3 m turning circle, tighter than 100% of SUVs in our database.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Audi Q4 e-tron 35 e-tron |  Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.66m+70mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.88m+14mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | 2.15m+40mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.62m-10mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.77m+2mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1490L | 1710L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | Not available | 2,084kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 55kWh | 63kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 221 mi | 269 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 165kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £40,750 | £39,010 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £40,750 (not eligible) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2023 | 2025+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 221 miles | 269 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 184 miles | 224 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 165 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.2 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 52 kWh | 59 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 8.1 sec (better) |
| Power | 125 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Torque | Not available | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Audi Q4 e-tron
35 e-tron
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
- Auto Express4.5/5
- DrivingElectric4.5/5
- Parkers4.3/5
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Audi Q4 e-tron 35 e-tron
Tested 2021
Adult Occupant93%
Child Occupant89%
Vulnerable Road Users66%
Safety Assist80%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Skoda Enyaq SE L 60
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant90%
Child Occupant87%
Vulnerable Road Users77%
Safety Assist78%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
What owners say
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.
Audi Q4 e-tron
35 e-tron
Owners love
- Owners consistently praise the quiet, refined cabin and comfortable ride.
- The interior quality and conventional layout, including physical climate controls, are rated above the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq it is based on.
- Rear passenger space and headroom are generous for the size of car.
Watch out for
- Real-world range falls well short of the WLTP figure, with owners of the 40 typically seeing 230-290 miles in mild weather and around 200 in freezing conditions.
- Efficiency is middling, around 3 miles per kWh on average and much less in cold city driving.
- The myAudi app and in-car software are widely described as limited or awkward, and some cars needed software updates.
Owner tips
- Judge battery health from a full-charge range over several days, not one cold-weather reading: the display is based on recent driving.
- Check whether the car has the optional heat pump if you do a lot of winter driving.
Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
Owners love
- Excellent practicality with spacious 585-litre boot and family-friendly interior design ideal for transporting cargo, pets, and passengers
- Outstanding real-world efficiency delivering 3-3.9 miles per kWh and 220-270 mile range even in winter conditions
- High-quality build with well-finished interior materials, soft-touch surfaces, and refined, quiet driving experience
Watch out for
- Rapid depreciation with young used EVs (1-2 years old) selling for 30-40% less than new list prices, making new purchases poor value
- Real-world range significantly lower than manufacturer WLTP claims (165-220 miles actual versus 250+ miles advertised), with cold weather reducing range by 25-30%
- Confusing option pack structure with excessive paid extras (rear side airbags, heating, fast charging, rear camera) that should be standard safety or convenience items
Owner tips
- Buy 1-2 year old Enyaq from non-approved dealers to save £2,000-3,000 while retaining full manufacturer warranty coverage
- Specify heat pump and fast charging (100/125kW) options when ordering new, as they significantly impact real-world satisfaction and hold value poorly used
Buying options
Get a quote
Audi Q4 e-tron
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Skoda Enyaq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi Q4 e-tron
- £19,0412023Car360View
- £18,3932023Car360View
Skoda Enyaq
No active listings.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron worth the extra £1,740 over the Skoda Enyaq?
The Audi Q4 e-tron costs £1,740 more than the Skoda Enyaq. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Skoda Enyaq is not just cheaper - it also offers 48 miles more WLTP range, 65 kW faster peak rapid charging and 65 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Audi Q4 e-tron or the Skoda Enyaq?
The Skoda Enyaq is £1,740 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £1,780 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 184 miles for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 40 miles further between charging stops.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Audi Q4 e-tron or the Skoda Enyaq?
The two are within 14 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 e-tron and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 0.9 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Audi Q4 e-tron or the Skoda Enyaq?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 e-tron comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best family EVsWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best city EVsWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq rank among EVs with the biggest boots
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .