In this comparison, Audi Q4 e-tron leads on family practicality, while the BYD ATTO 3 leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed.
Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron (2021-2023) if...
Choose the BYD ATTO 3 if...
Our take
The BYD ATTO 3 wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
EVO Design RWD
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £40,750 | £38,990 (better) |
| Official range | 221 miles | 317 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 520 L (better) | 440 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 35 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 5.5 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,455 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm (better) | 1,875 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm | 2,075 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,632 mm | 1,615 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m (better) | 10.4 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare (better) | 525 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 3 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L (better) | 440 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1490 L (better) | 1338 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 750 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
BYD ATTO 3
| Specification | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 e-tron | BYD ATTO 3 EVO Design RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.46m-133mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.88m+10mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | 2.08m-33mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.61m-17mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.72m-44mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 180mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L (better) | 440L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1490L (better) | 1338L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m (better) | 10.4m |
| Kerb Weight | Not available | 1,750kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 55kWh | 74.8kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 221 mi | 317 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 220kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £40,750 | £38,990 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2023 | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 221 miles | 317 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 184 miles | 263 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 35 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 220 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.2 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 147 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 52 kWh | 74.8 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 5.5 sec (better) |
| Power | 125 kW | 230 kW (better) |
| Torque | Not available | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Audi Q4 e-tron
35 e-tron
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

BYD ATTO 3
EVO Design RWD
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 250,000 km (better) |
Get a quote
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD ATTO 3
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD ATTO 3
No active listings.
The Audi Q4 e-tron costs £1,760 more than the BYD ATTO 3. For that premium it adds 80 litres more boot space. The BYD ATTO 3 is not just cheaper - it also offers 96 miles more WLTP range, 120 kW faster peak rapid charging and 105 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the BYD ATTO 3 comes out ahead overall.
The BYD ATTO 3 is £1,760 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the BYD ATTO 3 comes out roughly £1,800 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 184 miles for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 263 miles for the BYD ATTO 3 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The BYD ATTO 3 goes roughly 80 miles further between charging stops.
The two are within 10 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 e-tron and about 525 mm of total clearance for the BYD ATTO 3.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 90% for the BYD ATTO 3. That gives the BYD ATTO 3 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The BYD ATTO 3's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Audi Q4 e-tron's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 e-tron comparisons
More BYD ATTO 3 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi Q4 e-tron buyer’s guide: every version and battery explained, the 2021-2023 cars vs the 2024 update, the brake-software recall, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay, used vs new, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used BYD Atto 3 buyer’s guide: the original 60 kWh car vs the 2026 Atto 3 EVO, BYD’s long warranty, slow rapid charging, insurance, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .