Citroën ë-C4 vs Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 costs £18,145 more than the Citroën ë-C4. For that premium it adds 78 miles more WLTP range, 100 kW faster peak rapid charging and 75 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Citroën ë-C4 comes out ahead overall.

The Citroën ë-C4 is £18,145 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Citroën ë-C4 comes out roughly £18,225 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 161 miles for the Citroën ë-C4 and 206 miles for the Volvo EC40 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Volvo EC40 goes roughly 45 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-30 minutes.

The Citroën ë-C4 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 73 mm narrower than the Volvo EC40. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-C4 and about 527 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EC40.

Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Citroën ë-C4 and 84% for the Volvo EC40. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.