In this comparison, Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron stays competitive across the board, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Choose the Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
50 quattro
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron50 quattro | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £70,300 | £33,450 (better) |
| Official range | 290 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Boot space | 528 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 31 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 5.6 sec (better) | 8.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron50 quattro | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,915 mm | 4,649 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,935 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,189 mm | 2,148 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,619 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.2 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 465 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron50 quattro | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 528 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1567 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,800 kg (better) | 1,200 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 quattro | Skoda Enyaq iV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.92m | 4.65m-266mm |
| Width | 1.94m | 1.88m-56mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.19m | 2.15m-41mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.62m+1mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.93m | 2.77m-163mm |
| Ground Clearance | 172mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 528L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1567L | 1710L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 12.2m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,585kg | 1,924kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,800kg (better) | 1,200kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 95kWh (better) | 62kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 290 mi (better) | 249 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 150kW (better) | 120kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £70,300 | £33,450 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Coupe SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2023–2025 | 2021–2024 |
* Skoda Enyaq: Rapid charging depends on the build: early 2021 cars had 50 kW as standard with 100 kW (60) or 125 kW (80) optional; later cars 120 kW (60), 135 kW (80, 85) or 175 kW (2024 85x and vRS). Many adverts state it, e.g. "DC135kW".
* Skoda Enyaq: Latest WLTP figure for this version; earlier builds were rated slightly lower.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron50 quattro | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 290 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 242 miles (better) | 208 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 31 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 150 kW (better) | 120 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 89 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard (better) | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron50 quattro | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 5.6 sec (better) | 8.7 sec |
| Power | 250 kW (better) | 132 kW |
| Torque | 664 Nm (better) | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron50 quattro | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron
No active listings.
Skoda Enyaq
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron costs £36,850 more than the Skoda Enyaq. For that premium it adds 41 miles more WLTP range, 30 kW faster peak rapid charging and 118 kW more power. The Skoda Enyaq is not just cheaper - it also offers 57 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Enyaq is £36,850 cheaper to buy. The Skoda Enyaq is cheaper to charge, roughly £168 a year versus £224 for the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £37,130 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 242 miles for the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron and 208 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron goes roughly 34 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-31 minutes.
The Skoda Enyaq is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 56 mm narrower than the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 465 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 2.9 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi Q8 e-tron and Q8 Sportback e-tron buyer’s guide: 50 vs 55 quattro, how to tell it from the older e-tron, the brake-servo recall, battery warranty left, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
A used Skoda Enyaq buyer’s guide: 60 vs 80 vs 80x vs vRS vs the 2024 85, the slow-charging trap on early cars, heat pump or not, battery warranty, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .