In this comparison, Peugeot e-3008 leads on motorway range and running costs, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on city driving.
Choose the Peugeot e-3008 if...
Choose the Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) if...
Our take
The Peugeot e-3008 edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Peugeot e-3008Allure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £37,065 | £33,450 (better) |
| Official range | 326 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Boot space | 588 L (better) | 585 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8.8 sec | 8.7 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Peugeot e-3008Allure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,542 mm | 4,649 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,895 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,641 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.6 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 505 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Peugeot e-3008Allure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 588 L (better) | 585 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1663 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,250 kg (better) | 1,200 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Peugeot e-3008
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Peugeot e-3008 Allure | Skoda Enyaq iV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.54m | 4.65m+107mm |
| Width | 1.90m | 1.88m-16mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | 2.15m+40mm |
| Height | 1.64m | 1.62m-21mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.74m | 2.77m+26mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 588L (better) | 585L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1663L | 1710L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.6m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,108kg | 1,924kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,250kg (better) | 1,200kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 73kWh (better) | 62kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 326 mi (better) | 249 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 160kW (better) | 120kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £37,065 | £33,450 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £35,565 (-£1,500) | £33,450 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2021–2024 |
* Skoda Enyaq: Rapid charging depends on the build: early 2021 cars had 50 kW as standard with 100 kW (60) or 125 kW (80) optional; later cars 120 kW (60), 135 kW (80, 85) or 175 kW (2024 85x and vRS). Many adverts state it, e.g. "DC135kW".
* Skoda Enyaq: Latest WLTP figure for this version; earlier builds were rated slightly lower.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Peugeot e-3008Allure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 326 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 272 miles (better) | 208 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 160 kW (better) | 120 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 73 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Peugeot e-3008Allure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.8 sec | 8.7 sec (better) |
| Power | 157 kW (better) | 132 kW |
| Torque | 343 Nm (better) | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Peugeot e-3008
Allure

Skoda Enyaq
iV 60
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Peugeot e-3008Allure | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag infotainment & software, real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

Peugeot e-3008
Allure

Skoda Enyaq
iV 60
Get a quote
Peugeot e-3008
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Peugeot e-3008
No active listings.
Skoda Enyaq
The Peugeot e-3008 costs £3,615 more than the Skoda Enyaq. For that premium it adds 77 miles more WLTP range and 40 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Peugeot e-3008 comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Enyaq is £3,615 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £3,535 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 272 miles for the Peugeot e-3008 and 208 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Peugeot e-3008 goes roughly 65 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-30 minutes.
The two are within 16 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 505 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-3008. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Peugeot e-3008 comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Peugeot E-3008 buyer’s guide: Allure and GT, the 73 kWh and Long Range 97 kWh versions, the suspension and door-handle recalls, warranty left, real-world range, the heat pump question, what to pay vs new with the grant, and a printable checklist.
A used Skoda Enyaq buyer’s guide: 60 vs 80 vs 80x vs vRS vs the 2024 85, the slow-charging trap on early cars, heat pump or not, battery warranty, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .