In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed, while the Tesla Model X leads on family practicality.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV if...
Choose the Tesla Model X if...
Our take
The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
450 4MATIC
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Tesla Model X75D |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £129,170 | £82,050 (better) |
| Official range | 366 miles (better) | 238 miles |
| Boot space | 565 L | 745 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min (better) | 40 min |
| 0-62 mph | 6.1 sec (better) | 6.3 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Tesla Model X75D |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5,125 mm | 5,057 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,959 mm (better) | 1,999 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,157 mm (better) | 2,271 mm |
| Height | 1,718 mm | 1,684 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.9 m (better) | 12.4 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 441 mm spare (better) | 401 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Tesla Model X75D |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 4 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 565 L | 745 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 2020 L | 2492 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 183 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 2,268 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
Tesla Model X
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4MATIC | Tesla Model X 75D |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5.13m | 5.06m-68mm |
| Width | 1.96m | 2.00m+40mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.16m | 2.27m+114mm |
| Height | 1.72m | 1.68m-34mm |
| Wheelbase | 3.03m | 2.96m-65mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 180mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 565L | 745L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 2020L | 2492L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 183L |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.9m (better) | 12.4m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,805kg | 2,352kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 2,268kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 120kWh (better) | 75kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 366 mi (better) | 238 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 200kW (better) | 120kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £129,170 | £82,050 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2023+ | 2016–2019 |
* Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
* Tesla Model X: NEDC-era estimate — official WLTP not published for this variant
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Tesla Model X75D |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 366 miles (better) | 238 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 305 miles (better) | 171 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min (better) | 40 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 200 kW (better) | 120 kW |
| Home AC charging | 22 kW (better) | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 220 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 108.4 kWh (better) | 72.5 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NCA |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Tesla Model X75D |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.1 sec (better) | 6.3 sec |
| Power | 265 kW | 283 kW (better) |
| Torque | 800 Nm (better) | 430 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
450 4MATIC

Tesla Model X
75D
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4MATIC
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Tested 2019
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Tesla Model X75D |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 10 years (better) | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 250,000 km (better) | 240,000 km |
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
Tesla Model X
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
No active listings.
Tesla Model X
The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV costs £47,120 more than the Tesla Model X. For that premium it adds 128 miles more WLTP range and 80 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Tesla Model X is not just cheaper - it also offers 180 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV comes out ahead overall.
The Tesla Model X is £47,120 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £224 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Tesla Model X comes out roughly £47,040 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 305 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and 171 miles for the Tesla Model X - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV goes roughly 134 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 32 minutes in the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and 40 in the Tesla Model X, so the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV loses less time at each stop. That makes the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV the stronger long-distance car.
The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 40 mm narrower than the Tesla Model X. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 441 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and about 401 mm of total clearance for the Tesla Model X. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV also turns in a 0.5 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and 84% for the Tesla Model X. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has the longer battery warranty at 10 years, versus 8 for the Tesla Model X.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV comparisons
More Tesla Model X comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .