In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed, while the VW e-Golf leads on family practicality.
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
Choose the VW e-Golf if...
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Select
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW e-Golf24kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 (better) | £30,845 |
| Official range | 259 miles (better) | 118 miles |
| Boot space | 566 L (better) | 341 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min | 22 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 10.4 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW e-Golf24kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 4,270 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm | 1,799 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm (better) | 2,027 mm |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,482 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m (better) | 10.9 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare | 601 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW e-Golf24kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L (better) | 341 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L (better) | 1231 L |
| Frunk | 43 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
VW e-Golf
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Ford Puma Gen-E Select | VW e-Golf 24kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.27m-43mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.80m-6mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | 2.03m+97mm |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.48m-73mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.63m+43mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | 127mm-30mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L (better) | 341L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L (better) | 1231L |
| Frunk | 43L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m (better) | 10.9m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg (better) | 1,585kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46.8kWh (better) | 24.2kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 259 mi (better) | 118 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 40kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 (better) | £30,845 |
| Price after EV grant | £26,245 (-£3,750) | £30,845 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Available | 2026+ | 2014–2017 |
* VW e-Golf: NEDC figure — WLTP testing was not available for this model year
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW e-Golf24kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 259 miles (better) | 118 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 186 miles (better) | 71 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min | 22 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 40 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 3.6 kW |
| Energy consumption | 130 Wh/km (better) | 150 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.8 kWh (better) | 20.5 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW e-Golf24kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 10.4 sec |
| Power | 124 kW (better) | 85 kW |
| Torque | 290 Nm (better) | 270 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select

VW e-Golf
24kWh
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW e-Golf24kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £17,999 | £9,795 |
| Average used price | £20,750 | £9,795 |
| Active used listings trackedIndependent UK dealer listings seen in the last 90 days. | 10 listings (better) | 7 listings |
| Recent used-price trend | Down 23.4% over ~6 months | Up 3.2% over ~6 months |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2012
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | VW e-Golf24kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
VW e-Golf
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
VW e-Golf
The Ford Puma Gen-E is £850 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out roughly £970 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 71 miles for the VW e-Golf - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Ford Puma Gen-E goes roughly 116 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 22-26 minutes.
The two are within 6 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 601 mm of total clearance for the VW e-Golf and about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E. The Ford Puma Gen-E also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 84% for the VW e-Golf. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More VW e-Golf comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Ford Puma Gen-E buyer’s guide: the 43 kWh launch car vs the 2026 46.8 kWh update, real-world range, recalls, warranty left, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideBuying a used Volkswagen e-Golf: the 24.2 and 35.8 kWh versions, the battery warranty running out, realistic range, the charge-port fault owners report, recalls and what to pay in 2026.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .