In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser counters with the lowest price.
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Select
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Urban CruiserStandard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 | £28,495 (better) |
| Official range | 259 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Boot space | 566 L (better) | 310 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 9.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Urban CruiserStandard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 4,285 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm | 1,800 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm (better) | 2,065 mm |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,635 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare | 600 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Urban CruiserStandard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L (better) | 310 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L (better) | 566 L |
| Frunk | 43 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota Urban Cruiser
| Specification | Ford Puma Gen-E Select | Toyota Urban Cruiser Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.29m-28mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.80m-5mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | 2.06m+135mm |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.64m+80mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.70m+112mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | 180mm+23mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L (better) | 310L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L (better) | 566L |
| Frunk | 43L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg (better) | 1,720kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46.8kWh | 49kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 259 mi (better) | 213 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 53kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 | £28,495 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £26,245 (-£3,750) | £28,495 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Urban CruiserStandard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 259 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 186 miles (better) | 178 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 53 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 130 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.8 kWh | 49 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Urban CruiserStandard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 9.6 sec |
| Power | 124 kW (better) | 106 kW |
| Torque | 290 Nm (better) | 193 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select

Toyota Urban Cruiser
Standard Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota Urban CruiserStandard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota Urban Cruiser
No active listings.
The Ford Puma Gen-E costs £1,500 more than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. For that premium it adds 46 miles more WLTP range, 47 kW faster peak rapid charging and 256 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out ahead overall.
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is £1,500 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Toyota Urban Cruiser comes out roughly £1,420 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 178 miles for the Toyota Urban Cruiser - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-30 minutes.
The two are within 5 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Toyota Urban Cruiser and about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 90% for the Toyota Urban Cruiser. That gives the Toyota Urban Cruiser a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Toyota Urban Cruiser's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Ford Puma Gen-E's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More Toyota Urban Cruiser comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .