In this comparison, Ford Explorer counters with the lowest price, while the Volvo EX40 leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed.
Choose the Volvo EX40 if...
Our take
The Volvo EX40 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Single Motor Extended Range
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 (better) | £39,610 |
| Official range | 273 miles | 355 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 410 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 28 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.3 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm (better) | 1,873 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm | 2,034 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,651 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare (better) | 527 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | 917 mm (better) |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 4 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 410 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 1400 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | 1,500 kg (better) |
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.44m-28mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.87m+1mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.03m-29mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.65m+21mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.70m-65mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 410L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 1400L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | 917mm (better) |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg (better) | 2,075kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | 1,500kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 82kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 355 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 200kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 (better) | £39,610 |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £39,610 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 355 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 242 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 28 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 200 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km (better) | 167 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 82 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.3 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 185 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 420 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Volvo EX40
Single Motor Extended Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2018
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Volvo EX40
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Explorer
No active listings.
Volvo EX40
The Volvo EX40 costs £4,425 more than the Ford Explorer. For that premium it adds 83 miles more WLTP range, 95 kW faster peak rapid charging and 45 kW more power. The Ford Explorer is not just cheaper - it also offers 60 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Volvo EX40 comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Explorer is £4,425 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Explorer comes out roughly £4,465 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 242 miles for the Volvo EX40 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Volvo EX40 goes roughly 58 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-28 minutes.
The two are within 1 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer and about 527 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EX40.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 84% for the Volvo EX40. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Volvo EX40 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Volvo EX40 and EC40 buyer’s guide: Single Motor, Extended Range and Twin Motor compared, real-world range, warranty left, the B-mode braking recall, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .