In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on charging speed, while the Skoda Elroq leads on motorway range, family practicality and running costs.
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
Choose the Skoda Elroq if...
Our take
The Skoda Elroq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 | £33,970 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles | 280 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 470 L | 470 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min | Not available |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.5 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,488 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm (better) | 1,884 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,625 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare (better) | 516 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L | 470 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L | 1580 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg (better) | 0 kg |
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Skoda Elroq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.49m+20mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.88m+12mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.15m+85mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.63m-5mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.77m-2mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L | 470L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L | 1580L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg (better) | 2,457kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg (better) | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 61kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 280 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 105kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 | £33,970 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £32,470 (-£1,500) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 280 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 234 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min | Not available |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 105 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7.2 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.5 sec |
| Power | 140 kW | 140 kW |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Skoda Elroq
SE L 60
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Skoda Elroq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Explorer
No active listings.
Skoda Elroq
The Ford Explorer costs £1,215 more than the Skoda Elroq. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Elroq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Elroq is £1,215 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Elroq comes out roughly £1,335 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 234 miles for the Skoda Elroq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Elroq goes roughly 50 miles further between charging stops.
The two are within 12 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer and about 516 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Elroq. The Skoda Elroq also turns in a 1.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 84% for the Skoda Elroq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Skoda Elroq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Skoda Elroq buyer’s guide: 50, 60, 85 and vRS explained, the April 2026 battery change, warranty, real-world range, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .