Loading comparison
Ford Explorer vs Nissan ARIYA
At a glance
In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on charging speed and city driving, while the Nissan ARIYA leads on motorway range and running costs.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
Choose the Nissan ARIYA if...
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 2.1p per mile on off-peak electricity
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Ford Explorer edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Value
Ford
6.1
Nissan
5.8
Too close to call
Motorway RangeNissan
Ford
3.5
Nissan
4.3
Family
Ford
6.7
Nissan
6.9
Too close to call
ChargingFord
Ford
4.6
Nissan
2.8
Cost Per MileNissan
Ford
3.5
Nissan
4.6
City DrivingFord
Ford
5.4
Nissan
4.7
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 (better) | £37,000 |
| Official range | 273 miles (better) | 250 miles |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 466 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.5 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Ford Explorer
Nissan ARIYA
Length
Ford Explorer4,468mm-127mm
Nissan ARIYA4,595mm
Width
Ford Explorer1,872mm
Nissan ARIYA1,850mm-22mm
Height
Ford Explorer1,630mm-30mm
Nissan ARIYA1,660mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,595 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm | 1,850 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm (better) | 2,172 mm |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,660 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11.5 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare | 550 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 466 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 1350 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg (better) | 750 kg |
Full specifications
| Specification |  Ford Explorer Style 58kWh |  Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.59m+127mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.85m-22mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.17m+109mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.66m+30mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.77m+8mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 466L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 1350L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11.5m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg (better) | 1,917kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg (better) | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 63kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi (better) | 250 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 (better) | £37,000 |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) (better) | £35,500 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles (better) | 250 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 209 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 63 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.5 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 300 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh
Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Ford Explorer Style 58kWh
Tested 2024
Adult Occupant89%
Child Occupant86%
Vulnerable Road Users80%
Safety Assist72%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh
Tested 2022
Adult Occupant86%
Child Occupant89%
Vulnerable Road Users74%
Safety Assist93%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
What owners say
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh
Owners love
- Owners praise the quiet, comfortable ride and the planted, enjoyable handling, often rated above the VW ID.4.
- Efficiency is a strong point: owners report around 3.4 to 4 miles per kWh, 300+ miles from a full charge in mild weather and about 200 in winter.
- Rear-seat space is generous, and the interior is felt to be a step up from other Fords.
Watch out for
- A few owners report electrical faults soon after delivery (warning lights, a failed instrument display, a car that would only select neutral), with long waits for a diagnosis.
- Several owners report slow repairs, parts waits and difficulty getting a courtesy car, and some dealers were unfamiliar with the car.
- The heat pump and head-up display are extra-cost options.
Owner tips
- Precondition the car before cold-weather journeys to keep efficiency up.
- Check the car thoroughly on collection, including paint and every warning light, before accepting it.
Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
Owners love
- Owners praise the quiet, roomy cabin, the comfortable seats and the interior design.
- The 87 kWh cars give a long range in mild weather, with owners reporting around 280-300 miles.
- Owners who tow find it capable, and the head-up display and 360-degree camera are well liked.
Watch out for
- The infotainment and navigation feel slow and dated, with touch-sensitive buttons that are easy to brush by accident.
- Several owners report 12-volt battery problems, sometimes within the first months.
- Winter range drops noticeably, with one 87 kWh owner seeing the estimate fall from about 330 to 220-230 miles.
Owner tips
- Ask whether the 12-volt battery has been replaced, and consider a cheap 12-volt monitor.
- Use the battery percentage rather than the range estimate, which is unreliable for the first few charges and in winter.
Buying options
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Nissan ARIYA
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Nissan ARIYA worth the extra £1,815 over the Ford Explorer?
The Nissan ARIYA costs £1,815 more than the Ford Explorer. For that premium it adds 25 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Explorer comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Ford Explorer or the Nissan ARIYA?
The Ford Explorer is £1,815 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Explorer comes out roughly £1,775 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Ford Explorer and Nissan ARIYA like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Nissan ARIYA goes roughly 25 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-30 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Ford Explorer or the Nissan ARIYA?
The two are within 22 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA and about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer. The Ford Explorer also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Ford Explorer or the Nissan ARIYA?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 84% for the Nissan ARIYA. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Ford Explorer and Nissan ARIYA rank among the cheapest EVs after the grantWhere the Ford Explorer and Nissan ARIYA rank among the best family EVsWhere the Ford Explorer and Nissan ARIYA rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Ford Explorer and Nissan ARIYA rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Ford Explorer and Nissan ARIYA rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Ford Explorer and Nissan ARIYA rank among the best city EVs
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideBuying a Used Ford Explorer EV (2024 on): Standard or Extended Range, RWD or AWD, Recalls & What to Pay
A used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideBuying a Used Nissan Ariya (2022 on): 63 or 87 kWh, e-4ORCE, Motor Recalls, Range & What to Check
A used Nissan Ariya buyer’s guide: 63 vs 87 kWh, two-wheel drive vs e-4ORCE and Nismo, the motor and inverter recalls, 12-volt battery problems, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay vs a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .