In this comparison, BYD ATTO 3 leads on running costs and city driving, while the Nissan ARIYA stays competitive across the board.
Choose the BYD ATTO 3 (2023-2026) if...
Our take
The BYD ATTO 3 edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £36,990 (better) | £37,000 |
| Official range | 261 miles (better) | 250 miles |
| Boot space | 440 L | 466 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 7.3 sec (better) | 7.5 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,455 mm | 4,595 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,875 mm | 1,850 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,075 mm (better) | 2,172 mm |
| Height | 1,615 mm | 1,660 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m (better) | 11.5 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 525 mm spare | 550 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 3 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 440 L | 466 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1338 L | 1350 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 750 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
BYD ATTO 3
Nissan ARIYA
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | BYD ATTO 3 Comfort (2023-26) | Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.59m+140mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.85m-25mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.08m | 2.17m+97mm |
| Height | 1.61m | 1.66m+45mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.72m | 2.77m+55mm |
| Ground Clearance | 180mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 440L | 466L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1338L | 1350L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m (better) | 11.5m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,750kg (better) | 1,917kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 60.48kWh | 63kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 261 mi (better) | 250 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 88kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £36,990 (better) | £37,000 |
| Price after EV grant | £36,990 (not eligible) | £35,500 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2023–2026 | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 261 miles (better) | 250 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 213 miles (better) | 209 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 88 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7 kW |
| Energy consumption | 147 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 60.5 kWh | 63 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.3 sec (better) | 7.5 sec |
| Power | 150 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 300 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 250,000 km | Not available |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

BYD ATTO 3
Comfort (2023-26)

Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
Get a quote
BYD ATTO 3
Nissan ARIYA
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
BYD ATTO 3
Nissan ARIYA
No active listings.
The BYD ATTO 3 is £10 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the two land within £50 of each other - effectively the same to own. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 213 miles for the BYD ATTO 3 and 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-35 minutes.
The two are within 25 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA and about 525 mm of total clearance for the BYD ATTO 3. The BYD ATTO 3 also turns in a 1.1 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 92% battery health for the BYD ATTO 3 and 84% for the Nissan ARIYA. That gives the BYD ATTO 3 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The BYD ATTO 3's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Nissan ARIYA's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BYD ATTO 3 comparisons
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used BYD Atto 3 buyer’s guide: the original 60 kWh car vs the 2026 Atto 3 EVO, BYD’s long warranty, slow rapid charging, insurance, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Nissan Ariya buyer’s guide: 63 vs 87 kWh, two-wheel drive vs e-4ORCE and Nismo, the motor and inverter recalls, 12-volt battery problems, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay vs a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .