The MG ZS EV was replaced by the MG S5 EV in 2025. Compare the Ford Explorer with the MG S5 EV
In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on motorway range, charging speed and running costs, while the MG ZS EV counters with the lowest price.
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
Our take
The Ford Explorer leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Style 58kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 | £33,495 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles | 273 miles |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 448 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 36 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.4 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,323 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm | 1,809 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm (better) | 2,068 mm |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,625 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11.2 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare | 591 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 448 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 1457 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg (better) | 500 kg |
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | MG ZS EV Trophy Long Range 72kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.32m-145mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.81m-63mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.07m+5mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.63m-5mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.58m-182mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | 161mm-32mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 448L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 1457L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11.2m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg | 1,620kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg (better) | 500kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 72.6kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 273 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW (better) | 76kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 | £33,495 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £33,495 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2022–2025 |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 273 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 199 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 36 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW (better) | 76 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km (better) | 178 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 68.3 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.4 sec |
| Power | 140 kW (better) | 115 kW |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 280 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

MG ZS EV
Trophy Long Range 72kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2019
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years (better) | 7 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 128,748 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

MG ZS EV
Trophy Long Range 72kWh
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
MG ZS EV
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Explorer
No active listings.
MG ZS EV
The Ford Explorer costs £1,690 more than the MG ZS EV. For that premium it adds 29 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Explorer comes out ahead overall.
The MG ZS EV is £1,690 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MG ZS EV comes out roughly £1,610 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 199 miles for the MG ZS EV - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The MG ZS EV goes roughly 16 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 25 minutes in the Ford Explorer and 36 in the MG ZS EV, so the Ford Explorer loses less time at each stop. So the MG ZS EV stops less often while the Ford Explorer stops for less time - pick on which you would rather do.
The MG ZS EV is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 63 mm narrower than the Ford Explorer. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 591 mm of total clearance for the MG ZS EV and about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 90% for the MG ZS EV. That gives the MG ZS EV a modest edge in retained real-world range. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. The Ford Explorer has the longer battery warranty at 8 years, versus 7 for the MG ZS EV.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More MG ZS EV comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
A used MG ZS EV buyer’s guide: the original 44.5 kWh car vs the 2022 update with 51 or 72.6 kWh, real-world range, MG’s 7-year warranty, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .