The MG ZS EV was replaced by the MG S5 EV in 2025. Compare the MG S5 EV with the Toyota C-HR+
In this comparison, MG ZS EV leads on city driving, while the Toyota C-HR+ leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed.
Choose the MG ZS EV if...
Choose the Toyota C-HR+ if...
Our take
The Toyota C-HR+ leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,495 (better) | £34,495 |
| Official range | 273 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 448 L (better) | 416 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 36 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8.4 sec | 8.4 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,323 mm | 4,520 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,809 mm (better) | 1,870 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,068 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,625 mm | 1,595 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.2 m | 11 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 591 mm spare (better) | 530 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 448 L (better) | 416 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1457 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 500 kg | Not available |
| Specification | MG ZS EV Trophy Long Range 72kWh | Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.32m | 4.52m+197mm |
| Width | 1.81m | 1.87m+61mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.07m | Not available |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.59m-30mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.58m | 2.75m+165mm |
| Ground Clearance | 161mm | 185mm+24mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 448L (better) | 416L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1457L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.2m | 11m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,620kg (better) | 1,828kg |
| Towing Capacity | 500kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 72.6kWh (better) | 58kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 283 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 76kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,495 (better) | £34,495 |
| Price after EV grant | £33,495 (not eligible) | £32,995 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2022–2025 | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 199 miles | 235 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 36 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 76 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Energy consumption | 178 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 68.3 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.4 sec | 8.4 sec |
| Power | 115 kW | 123 kW (better) |
| Torque | 280 Nm (better) | 269 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

MG ZS EV
Trophy Long Range 72kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Toyota C-HR+
Standard Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | MG ZS EVTrophy Long Range 72kWh | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 7 years | 8 years (better) |
| Battery warranty distance | 128,748 km | 160,000 km (better) |
Get a quote
MG ZS EV
Toyota C-HR+
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
MG ZS EV
Toyota C-HR+
No active listings.
The Toyota C-HR+ costs £1,000 more than the MG ZS EV. For that premium it adds 74 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota C-HR+ comes out ahead overall.
The MG ZS EV is £1,000 cheaper to buy. The Toyota C-HR+ is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £192 for the MG ZS EV, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MG ZS EV comes out roughly £720 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 199 miles for the MG ZS EV and 235 miles for the Toyota C-HR+ - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota C-HR+ goes roughly 37 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-36 minutes.
The MG ZS EV is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 61 mm narrower than the Toyota C-HR+. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 591 mm of total clearance for the MG ZS EV and about 530 mm of total clearance for the Toyota C-HR+.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the MG ZS EV and 84% for the Toyota C-HR+. That gives the MG ZS EV a modest edge in retained real-world range. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. The Toyota C-HR+ has the longer battery warranty at 8 years, versus 7 for the MG ZS EV.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More MG ZS EV comparisons
More Toyota C-HR+ comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .