In this comparison, Ford E-Tourneo Courier leads on running costs, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Choose the Ford E-Tourneo Courier if...
Choose the Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
iV 60
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,690 | £33,450 (better) |
| Official range | 196 miles | 249 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 570 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 11 sec | 8.7 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,337 mm | 4,649 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,876 mm (better) | 1,879 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,817 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.7 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 524 mm spare (better) | 521 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 570 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1710 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,200 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Ford E-Tourneo Courier Titanium | Skoda Enyaq iV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.34m | 4.65m+312mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.88m+3mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.15m |
| Height | 1.82m | 1.62m-197mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.69m | 2.77m+73mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 570L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1710L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.7m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,724kg (better) | 1,924kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,200kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46kWh | 62kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 196 mi | 249 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 120kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,690 | £33,450 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £29,940 (-£3,750) | £33,450 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | MPV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2021–2024 |
* Skoda Enyaq: Rapid charging depends on the build: early 2021 cars had 50 kW as standard with 100 kW (60) or 125 kW (80) optional; later cars 120 kW (60), 135 kW (80, 85) or 175 kW (2024 85x and vRS). Many adverts state it, e.g. "DC135kW".
* Skoda Enyaq: Latest WLTP figure for this version; earlier builds were rated slightly lower.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 196 miles | 249 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 163 miles | 208 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 120 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 43.6 kWh | 58 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 11 sec | 8.7 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW | 132 kW (better) |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 310 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Titanium

Skoda Enyaq
iV 60
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CourierTitanium | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford E-Tourneo Courier
No active listings.
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is £240 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the two land within £200 of each other - effectively the same to own. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 163 miles for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 208 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 44 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 35 minutes in the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 24 in the Skoda Enyaq, so the Skoda Enyaq loses less time at each stop. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the stronger long-distance car.
The two are within 3 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 524 mm of total clearance for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford E-Tourneo Courier comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .