Loading comparison
Citroën ë-C4 X (2023-2024) vs Skoda Epiq
Selected trim50kWh 136 · 2023-24Change trim222 mi · 50 kWh · £31,995
At a glance
In this comparison, Citroën ë-C4 X leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the Skoda Epiq leads on running costs and city driving.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Citroën ë-C4 X (2023-2024) if...
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
- you need the fastest charging of these options
Choose the Skoda Epiq if...
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.7p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Citroën ë-C4 X leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Value
Citroën
5.4
Skoda
5.5
Too close to call
Motorway RangeCitroën
Citroën
5.1
Skoda
4
FamilyCitroën
Citroën
8.6
Skoda
4.5
ChargingCitroën
Citroën
6
Skoda
3.2
Cost Per MileSkoda
Citroën
7.4
Skoda
9.2
City DrivingSkoda
Citroën
5.9
Skoda
7.8
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £31,995 | £24,950 (better) |
| Official range | 222 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Boot space | 510 L (better) | 475 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 28 min |
| 0-62 mph | 10.8 sec | 9.8 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Citroën ë-C4 X
Skoda Epiq
Length
Citroën ë-C4 X4,600mm
Skoda Epiq4,200mm-400mm
Width
Citroën ë-C4 X1,800mm
Skoda Epiq1,798mm-2mm
Height
Citroën ë-C4 X1,525mm-56mm
Skoda Epiq1,581mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,200 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,800 mm | 1,798 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,525 mm | 1,581 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 10.7 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 600 mm spare | 602 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 510 L (better) | 475 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1345 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | 25 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,200 kg (better) |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Citroën ë-C4 X
- At 4,600 mm, longer than 100% of hatchback EVs we track.
- 2nd-largest boot among hatchback EVs in our catalogue at 510 L.
Skoda Epiq
- At 4,200 mm, shorter than 90% of SUVs in our UK catalogue.
- One of 33 of 233 UK EVs in our catalogue with V2L (vehicle-to-load) support.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Citroën ë-C4 X 50kWh 136 (2023-24) |  Skoda Epiq SE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.60m | 4.20m-400mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.80m-2mm |
| Height | 1.52m | 1.58m+56mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.67m | 2.60m-69mm |
| Ground Clearance | 156mm | 125mm-31mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 510L (better) | 475L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1345L |
| Frunk | Not available | 25L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 10.68m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,580kg | 1,542kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,200kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 50kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 222 mi (better) | 190 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 90kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £31,995 | £24,950 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £31,995 (not eligible) | £23,450 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2023–2024 | 2026+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 222 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 185 miles (better) | 158 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 28 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 90 kW |
| Home AC charging | 7.4 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 46 kWh (better) | 37 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 10.8 sec | 9.8 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW (better) | 99 kW |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 267 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Citroën ë-C4 X 50kWh 136 (2023-24)
Tested 2021
Adult Occupant80%
Child Occupant83%
Vulnerable Road Users57%
Safety Assist63%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | Not available |
Buying options
Get a quote
Citroën ë-C4 X
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Skoda Epiq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Citroën ë-C4 X worth the extra £7,045 over the Skoda Epiq?
The Citroën ë-C4 X costs £7,045 more than the Skoda Epiq. For that premium it adds 32 miles more WLTP range. The Skoda Epiq is not just cheaper - it also offers a 1.0s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Citroën ë-C4 X comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Citroën ë-C4 X or the Skoda Epiq?
The Skoda Epiq is £7,045 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £136 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Epiq comes out roughly £7,125 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Citroën ë-C4 X and Skoda Epiq like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 185 miles for the Citroën ë-C4 X and 158 miles for the Skoda Epiq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Citroën ë-C4 X goes roughly 27 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-28 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Citroën ë-C4 X or the Skoda Epiq?
The two are within 2 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 602 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Epiq and about 600 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-C4 X.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Citroën ë-C4 X or the Skoda Epiq?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Citroën ë-C4 X and 90% for the Skoda Epiq. That gives the Skoda Epiq a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Skoda Epiq's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Citroën ë-C4 X's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Citroën ë-C4 X comparisons
More Skoda Epiq comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Citroën ë-C4 X and Skoda Epiq rank among the best family EVsWhere the Citroën ë-C4 X and Skoda Epiq rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Citroën ë-C4 X and Skoda Epiq rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Citroën ë-C4 X and Skoda Epiq rank among the best city EVsWhere the Citroën ë-C4 X and Skoda Epiq rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Citroën ë-C4 X and Skoda Epiq rank among EVs with the biggest boots
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .