In this comparison, Audi S e-tron GT leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Renault 5 Turbo 3E leads on charging speed and city driving.
Choose the Audi S e-tron GT if...
Choose the Renault 5 Turbo 3E if...
Our take
The Audi S e-tron GT leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi S e-tron GTBase | Renault 5 Turbo 3EBase |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £108,825 (better) | £135,000 |
| Official range | 373 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Boot space | 405 L | Not available |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 18 min | 15 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 3.4 sec (better) | 3.5 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi S e-tron GTBase | Renault 5 Turbo 3EBase |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,989 mm | 4,080 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,964 mm (better) | 2,030 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,158 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,414 mm | 1,380 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m | Not available |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 436 mm spare (better) | 370 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi S e-tron GTBase | Renault 5 Turbo 3EBase |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 405 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 85 L | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi S e-tron GT
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Renault 5 Turbo 3E
| Specification | Audi S e-tron GT Base | Renault 5 Turbo 3E Base |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.99m | 4.08m-909mm |
| Width | 1.96m | 2.03m+66mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.16m | Not available |
| Height | 1.41m | 1.38m-34mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.90m | 2.57m-330mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 405L | Not available |
| Frunk | 85L | Not available |
| Seats | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m | Not available |
| Kerb Weight | 2,385kg | 1,450kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 105kWh (better) | 70kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 373 mi (better) | 249 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 320kW | 350kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £108,825 (better) | £135,000 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Available | 2024+ | 2027+ |
* Audi S e-tron GT: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
* Renault 5 Turbo 3E: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi S e-tron GTBase | Renault 5 Turbo 3EBase |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 373 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 311 miles (better) | 207 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 18 min | 15 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 320 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 105 kWh (better) | 70 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V | 800V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi S e-tron GTBase | Renault 5 Turbo 3EBase |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 3.4 sec (better) | 3.5 sec |
| Power | 500 kW (better) | 410 kW |
| Torque | 590 Nm | 4800 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Audi S e-tron GT Base
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Renault 5 Turbo 3E Base
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi S e-tron GTBase | Renault 5 Turbo 3EBase |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Audi S e-tron GT
Renault 5 Turbo 3E
The Renault 5 Turbo 3E costs £26,175 more than the Audi S e-tron GT. For that premium it adds 30 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Audi S e-tron GT is not just cheaper - it also offers 124 miles more WLTP range, 90 kW more power and 2 more seats (4 versus 2). On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi S e-tron GT comes out ahead overall.
The Audi S e-tron GT is £26,175 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £192 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Audi S e-tron GT comes out roughly £26,175 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 311 miles for the Audi S e-tron GT and 207 miles for the Renault 5 Turbo 3E - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Audi S e-tron GT goes roughly 104 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 15-18 minutes.
The Audi S e-tron GT is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 66 mm narrower than the Renault 5 Turbo 3E. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 436 mm of total clearance for the Audi S e-tron GT and about 370 mm of total clearance for the Renault 5 Turbo 3E.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi S e-tron GT and 84% for the Renault 5 Turbo 3E. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi S e-tron GT comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .