In this comparison, Audi Q4 e-tron leads on motorway range, charging speed and running costs, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on value for money.
Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron if...
Choose the Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) if...
Our take
The Audi Q4 e-tron leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £46,260 | £33,450 (better) |
| Official range | 274 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Boot space | 520 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 8.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,649 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm (better) | 1,879 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,632 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare (better) | 521 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1490 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,200 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Audi Q4 e-tron e-tron 204PS | Skoda Enyaq iV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.65m+61mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.88m+14mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | 2.15m+40mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.62m-12mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.77m+1mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1490L | 1710L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,940kg | 1,924kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,200kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh (better) | 62kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 274 mi (better) | 249 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 160kW (better) | 120kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £46,260 | £33,450 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2021–2024 |
* Skoda Enyaq: Rapid charging depends on the build: early 2021 cars had 50 kW as standard with 100 kW (60) or 125 kW (80) optional; later cars 120 kW (60), 135 kW (80, 85) or 175 kW (2024 85x and vRS). Many adverts state it, e.g. "DC135kW".
* Skoda Enyaq: Latest WLTP figure for this version; earlier builds were rated slightly lower.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 274 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 229 miles (better) | 208 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 160 kW (better) | 120 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 59 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 8.7 sec |
| Power | 150 kW (better) | 132 kW |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Audi Q4 e-tron
e-tron 204PS

Skoda Enyaq
iV 60
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi Q4 e-tron
No active listings.
Skoda Enyaq
The Audi Q4 e-tron costs £12,810 more than the Skoda Enyaq. For that premium it adds 25 miles more WLTP range and 40 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Skoda Enyaq is not just cheaper - it also offers 65 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi Q4 e-tron comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Enyaq is £12,810 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £12,770 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 229 miles for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 208 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Audi Q4 e-tron goes roughly 21 miles further between charging stops.
The two are within 14 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 e-tron and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 0.9 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 e-tron comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi Q4 e-tron buyer’s guide: every version and battery explained, the 2021-2023 cars vs the 2024 update, the brake-software recall, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay, used vs new, and a printable checklist.
A used Skoda Enyaq buyer’s guide: 60 vs 80 vs 80x vs vRS vs the 2024 85, the slow-charging trap on early cars, heat pump or not, battery warranty, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .