In this comparison, Audi Q4 e-tron leads on city driving, while the Toyota bZ4X leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed.
Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron (2021-2023) if...
Choose the Toyota bZ4X (2022-2025) if...
Our take
The Toyota bZ4X leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Toyota bZ4XFWD 71.4kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £40,750 (better) | £41,950 |
| Official range | 221 miles | 321 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 520 L (better) | 452 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Toyota bZ4XFWD 71.4kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,690 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm | 1,860 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,632 mm | 1,650 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m (better) | 11.2 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare | 540 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Toyota bZ4XFWD 71.4kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 4 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L (better) | 452 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1490 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 750 kg |
| Specification | Audi Q4 e-tron 35 e-tron | Toyota bZ4X FWD 71.4kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.69m+102mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.86m-5mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | Not available |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.65m+18mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.85m+86mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 177mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L (better) | 452L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1490L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m (better) | 11.2m |
| Kerb Weight | Not available | 1,975kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 55kWh | 71.4kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 221 mi | 321 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £40,750 (better) | £41,950 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2023 | 2022–2025 |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Toyota bZ4XFWD 71.4kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 221 miles | 321 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 184 miles | 267 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.2 kW (better) | 6.6 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 52 kWh | 64 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Toyota bZ4XFWD 71.4kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
| Power | 125 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Torque | Not available | 269 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Toyota bZ4XFWD 71.4kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £19,560 | £23,540 |
| Average used price | £22,100 | £25,560 |
| Active used listings trackedIndependent UK dealer listings seen in the last 90 days. | 8 listings (better) | 2 listings |
| Recent used-price trend | Broadly flat | Down 24.5% over ~6 months |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Toyota bZ4XFWD 71.4kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

Audi Q4 e-tron
35 e-tron

Toyota bZ4X
FWD 71.4kWh
Get a quote
Audi Q4 e-tron
Toyota bZ4X
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X costs £1,200 more than the Audi Q4 e-tron. For that premium it adds 100 miles more WLTP range and 50 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Audi Q4 e-tron is not just cheaper - it also offers 68 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota bZ4X comes out ahead overall.
The Audi Q4 e-tron is £1,200 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Audi Q4 e-tron comes out roughly £1,120 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 184 miles for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 267 miles for the Toyota bZ4X - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota bZ4X goes roughly 83 miles further between charging stops.
The two are within 5 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 540 mm of total clearance for the Toyota bZ4X and about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 e-tron. The Audi Q4 e-tron also turns in a 1.0 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 84% for the Toyota bZ4X. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 e-tron comparisons
More Toyota bZ4X comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi Q4 e-tron buyer’s guide: every version and battery explained, the 2021-2023 cars vs the 2024 update, the brake-software recall, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay, used vs new, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Toyota bZ4X buyer’s guide: the 2022-2025 car vs the 2026 update, FWD vs AWD, 6.6 or 11 kW charging, recalls, Toyota’s service-activated warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .