In this comparison, Peugeot e-308 leads on value for money, family practicality and charging speed, while the Skoda Epiq leads on city driving.
Choose the Peugeot e-308 if...
Choose the Skoda Epiq if...
Our take
The Peugeot e-308 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Peugeot e-308Allure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £31,065 | £24,950 (better) |
| Official range | 279 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Boot space | 548 L (better) | 475 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 28 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9.8 sec | 9.8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Peugeot e-308Allure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,367 mm | 4,200 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,852 mm | 1,798 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,062 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,464 mm | 1,581 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.1 m | 10.7 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 548 mm spare | 602 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Peugeot e-308Allure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 548 L (better) | 475 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1258 L | 1345 L (better) |
| Frunk | 0 L | 25 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,200 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Peugeot e-308
Skoda Epiq
| Specification | Peugeot e-308 Allure | Skoda Epiq SE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.37m | 4.20m-167mm |
| Width | 1.85m | 1.80m-54mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | Not available |
| Height | 1.46m | 1.58m+117mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.67m | 2.60m-74mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 125mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 548L (better) | 475L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1258L | 1345L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 25L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.1m | 10.68m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,676kg | 1,542kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,200kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 279 mi (better) | 190 mi |
| Max DC Charge | Not available | 90kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £31,065 | £24,950 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £29,565 (-£1,500) | £23,450 (-£1,500) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Estate | SUV |
| Available | 2022+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Peugeot e-308Allure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 279 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 232 miles (better) | 158 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 28 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | Not available | 90 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 55 kWh (better) | 37 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Peugeot e-308Allure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9.8 sec | 9.8 sec |
| Power | 115 kW (better) | 99 kW |
| Torque | 270 Nm (better) | 267 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Peugeot e-308
Allure

Skoda Epiq
SE L 40
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Peugeot e-308Allure | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
Get a quote
Peugeot e-308
Skoda Epiq
The Peugeot e-308 costs £6,115 more than the Skoda Epiq. For that premium it adds 89 miles more WLTP range and 73 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Peugeot e-308 comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Epiq is £6,115 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £136 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Epiq comes out roughly £6,155 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 232 miles for the Peugeot e-308 and 158 miles for the Skoda Epiq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Peugeot e-308 goes roughly 75 miles further between charging stops.
The Skoda Epiq is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 54 mm narrower than the Peugeot e-308. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 602 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Epiq and about 548 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-308. The Skoda Epiq also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Peugeot e-308 and 90% for the Skoda Epiq. That gives the Skoda Epiq a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Skoda Epiq's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Peugeot e-308's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Peugeot e-308 comparisons
More Skoda Epiq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .