The Mercedes-Benz EQB was replaced by the Mercedes-Benz GLB in 2026. Compare the Mercedes-Benz GLB with the Nissan ARIYA
In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQB leads on family practicality, while the Nissan ARIYA leads on value for money, motorway range and running costs.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQB if...
Choose the Nissan ARIYA if...
Our take
The Nissan ARIYA wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £52,145 | £37,000 (better) |
| Official range | 257 miles (better) | 250 miles |
| Boot space | 495 L (better) | 466 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.5 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,684 mm | 4,595 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,834 mm (better) | 1,850 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm (better) | 2,172 mm |
| Height | 1,667 mm | 1,660 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.7 m | 11.5 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 566 mm spare (better) | 550 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 7 (better) | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 4 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 495 L (better) | 466 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1410 L (better) | 1350 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,700 kg (better) | 750 kg |
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC | Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.68m | 4.59m-89mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.85m+16mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | 2.17m+152mm |
| Height | 1.67m | 1.66m-7mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.83m | 2.77m-54mm |
| Ground Clearance | 170mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 495L (better) | 466L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1410L (better) | 1350L |
| Seats | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.7m | 11.5m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,105kg | 1,917kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,700kg (better) | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 69.7kWh (better) | 63kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 257 mi (better) | 250 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £52,145 | £37,000 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £52,145 (not eligible) | £35,500 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2022–2025 | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 257 miles (better) | 250 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 214 miles (better) | 209 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 66.5 kWh (better) | 63 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.5 sec (better) |
| Power | 168 kW (better) | 160 kW |
| Torque | 390 Nm (better) | 300 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Mercedes-Benz EQB
300 4MATIC

Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQB
Nissan ARIYA
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQB
Nissan ARIYA
No active listings.
The Mercedes-Benz EQB costs £15,145 more than the Nissan ARIYA. For that premium it adds 2 more seats (7 versus 5). The Nissan ARIYA is not just cheaper - it also offers 30 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Nissan ARIYA comes out ahead overall.
The Nissan ARIYA is £15,145 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Nissan ARIYA comes out roughly £15,225 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 214 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQB and 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-32 minutes.
The two are within 16 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQB and about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQB and 84% for the Nissan ARIYA. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQB comparisons
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Mercedes EQB buyer’s guide: the seven-seat 300 and 350 4MATIC vs the 2024 250+, the steering software recall, real-world range, the battery warranty, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Nissan Ariya buyer’s guide: 63 vs 87 kWh, two-wheel drive vs e-4ORCE and Nismo, the motor and inverter recalls, 12-volt battery problems, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay vs a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .