Loading comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Volvo C40 Recharge
Selected trim250 · 2021-22Change trim263 mi · 66.5 kWh · £43,495
Selected trimSingle Motor FWD · 2022-23Change trim272 mi · 69 kWh · £48,355
At a glance
The Volvo C40 Recharge was replaced by the Volvo EC40 in 2024. Compare the Mercedes-Benz EQA with the Volvo EC40
In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQA counters with the lowest price, while the Volvo C40 Recharge leads on value for money.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Volvo C40 Recharge if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Volvo C40 Recharge edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
ValueVolvo
Mercedes-Benz
4.8
Volvo
5.5
Motorway Range
Mercedes-Benz
4.1
Volvo
3.9
Too close to call
Family
Mercedes-Benz
5.6
Volvo
5.4
Too close to call
Cost Per Mile
Mercedes-Benz
4.5
Volvo
4.5
Too close to call
City Driving
Mercedes-Benz
5.1
Volvo
4.7
Too close to call
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Volvo C40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
- 73 litres more boot space
- 30 kW faster rapid charging
- 30 kW more power
- 750 kg more towing capacity
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo C40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £43,495 (better) | £48,355 |
| Official range | 263 miles | 272 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 340 L | 413 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min (better) | 37 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.4 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Volvo C40 Recharge
Length
Mercedes-Benz EQA4,463mm
Volvo C40 Recharge4,440mm-23mm
Width
Mercedes-Benz EQA1,834mm-29mm
Volvo C40 Recharge1,863mm
Height
Mercedes-Benz EQA1,620mm
Volvo C40 Recharge1,596mm-24mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo C40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,463 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,834 mm (better) | 1,863 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm (better) | 2,034 mm |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,596 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.4 m | 11.4 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 566 mm spare (better) | 537 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo C40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 340 L | 413 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1320 L (better) | 1205 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,500 kg (better) |
Full specifications
| Specification |  Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 |  Volvo C40 Recharge Single Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.44m-23mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.86m+29mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | 2.03m+14mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.60m-24mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.73m | 2.70m-27mm |
| Ground Clearance | 168mm | 175mm+7mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 340L | 413L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1320L (better) | 1205L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.4m | 11.4m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,040kg | 2,010kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,500kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 66.5kWh | 69kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 263 mi | 272 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £43,495 (better) | £48,355 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Coupe SUV |
| Available | 2021–2022 | 2022–2023 |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo C40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 263 miles | 272 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 219 miles | 227 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min (better) | 37 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 66.5 kWh (better) | 66 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo C40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.4 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 170 kW (better) |
| Torque | 375 Nm (better) | 330 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
250
Volvo C40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
New and used prices
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo C40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £16,278 | £20,531 |
| Average used price | £18,653 | £20,730 |
| Active used listings trackedIndependent UK dealer listings seen in the last 90 days. | 4 listings | 6 listings (better) |
| Recent used-price trend | Down 1.2% over ~6 months | Down 1.2% over ~6 months |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Mercedes-Benz EQA 250
Tested 2019
Adult Occupant97%
Child Occupant90%
Vulnerable Road Users81%
Safety Assist75%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Volvo C40 Recharge Single Motor FWD
Tested 2022
Adult Occupant92%
Child Occupant89%
Vulnerable Road Users70%
Safety Assist89%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo C40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
What owners say
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range, seat comfort & space. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
250
Owners love
- Owners consistently praise the build quality, quietness and comfort, with very comfortable front seats.
- Real-world range is close to or above the official figure in summer for many owners, with around 3.5 to 4.5 miles per kWh reported.
- Rapid charging holds a high rate for much of the charge, so stops are quick by the standards of its size.
Watch out for
- The car has no built-in charge scheduling, so owners rely on a smart home charger or tariff app for cheap night rates.
- Winter range drops to roughly 200 miles or less, and the range display can be inaccurate.
- The boot is small and rear legroom is tight for tall passengers because of the raised floor.
Owner tips
- Use a smart home charger or tariff app to time charging, as the car cannot.
- Use the D Auto regeneration setting for the best efficiency.
Volvo C40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
Owners love
- Owners praise the quiet cabin, comfortable seats and build quality.
- The Google-based infotainment and the smooth one-pedal driving are widely liked.
- Even the entry Core trim is well equipped, with a reversing camera, parking sensors, a panoramic glass roof and a powered tailgate.
Watch out for
- Efficiency is modest: owners commonly see around 3 miles per kWh, and winter range falls to roughly 180-200 miles.
- Rear visibility through the sloping rear window is poor and rear headroom is tighter than in the XC40.
- Some owners find the ride firm over poor surfaces and the steering light.
Owner tips
- Owners recommend the rear-wheel-drive single motor (from 2023) over the earlier front-wheel-drive version for its better range and efficiency.
- Plan on around 190-200 miles of winter range rather than the WLTP figure.
Buying options
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Volvo C40 Recharge
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
- £16,6992022Car360View
Volvo C40 Recharge
- £20,9292023Car360View
- £20,5312023Car360View
Frequently asked questions
Is the Volvo C40 Recharge worth the extra £4,860 over the Mercedes-Benz EQA?
The Volvo C40 Recharge costs £4,860 more than the Mercedes-Benz EQA. For that premium it adds 30 kW faster peak rapid charging, 73 litres more boot space and 30 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Volvo C40 Recharge comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Mercedes-Benz EQA or the Volvo C40 Recharge?
The Mercedes-Benz EQA is £4,860 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Mercedes-Benz EQA comes out roughly £4,860 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo C40 Recharge like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 219 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 227 miles for the Volvo C40 Recharge - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-37 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Mercedes-Benz EQA or the Volvo C40 Recharge?
The two are within 29 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and about 537 mm of total clearance for the Volvo C40 Recharge.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Mercedes-Benz EQA or the Volvo C40 Recharge?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 84% for the Volvo C40 Recharge. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQA comparisons
More Volvo C40 Recharge comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo C40 Recharge rank among the best family EVsWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo C40 Recharge rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo C40 Recharge rank among the best city EVsWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo C40 Recharge rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo C40 Recharge rank among EVs with the biggest bootsWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo C40 Recharge rank among Best Used Electric Cars Under £10,000 (UK)
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideUsed Mercedes-Benz EQA buyer's guide (2021-on)
Buying a used Mercedes-Benz EQA: the 250, 250+ and 4MATIC versions, realistic range, the software recalls, what owners report and what to pay in 2026.
GuideBuying a Used Volvo C40 Recharge (2022-2024): Which Version, Range, Recalls & What to Check
A used Volvo C40 Recharge buyer’s guide: front vs rear-drive single motor, Twin 78 vs 82 kWh, the heat pump, warranty left, braking-software recalls, real-world and winter range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .