In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQA leads on motorway range, running costs and city driving, while the Smart #5 leads on value for money, family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQA if...
Choose the Smart #5 if...
Our take
The Smart #5 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Pro
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £43,495 | £39,800 (better) |
| Official range | 263 miles | 288 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 340 L | 630 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 6.9 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,463 mm | 4,695 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,834 mm (better) | 1,920 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm (better) | 2,169 mm |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,705 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.4 m | Not available |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 566 mm spare (better) | 480 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 340 L | 630 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1320 L | 1530 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 47 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,600 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Smart #5
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 | Smart #5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.70m+232mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.92m+86mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | 2.17m+149mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.71m+85mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.73m | 2.90m+171mm |
| Ground Clearance | 168mm | 190mm+22mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 340L | 630L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1320L | 1530L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 47L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.4m | Not available |
| Kerb Weight | 2,040kg (better) | 2,200kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,600kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 66.5kWh | 76kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 263 mi | 288 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £43,495 | £39,800 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2022 | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 263 miles | 288 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 219 miles (better) | 202 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 185 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 66.5 kWh | 76 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 800V (better) |
| Heat pump | Standard (better) | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 6.9 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 250 kW (better) |
| Torque | 375 Nm (better) | 373 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Mercedes-Benz EQA
250

Smart #5
Pro
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | Not available |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

Mercedes-Benz EQA
250

Smart #5
Pro
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Smart #5
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Smart #5
No active listings.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA costs £3,695 more than the Smart #5. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Smart #5 is not just cheaper - it also offers 25 miles more WLTP range, 50 kW faster peak rapid charging and 290 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Smart #5 comes out ahead overall.
The Smart #5 is £3,695 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Smart #5 comes out roughly £3,575 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 219 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 202 miles for the Smart #5 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mercedes-Benz EQA goes roughly 17 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-30 minutes.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 86 mm narrower than the Smart #5. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and about 480 mm of total clearance for the Smart #5.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 90% for the Smart #5. That gives the Smart #5 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Smart #5's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Mercedes-Benz EQA's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQA comparisons
More Smart #5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .