In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQA stays competitive across the board, while the Omoda E5 leads on value for money, charging speed and city driving.
Choose the Omoda E5 if...
Our take
The Omoda E5 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Knight
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £43,495 | £33,065 (better) |
| Official range | 263 miles | 267 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 340 L | 380 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 28 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,463 mm | 4,424 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,834 mm | 1,830 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,588 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.4 m | 10.8 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 566 mm spare | 570 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 340 L | 380 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1320 L (better) | 1075 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | Not available |
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 | Omoda E5 Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.42m-39mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.83m-4mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | Not available |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.59m-32mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.73m | 2.63m-99mm |
| Ground Clearance | 168mm | 147mm-21mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 340L | 380L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1320L (better) | 1075L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.4m | 10.8m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,040kg | 1,710kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 66.5kWh (better) | 61kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 263 mi | 267 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £43,495 | £33,065 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2022 | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 263 miles | 267 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 219 miles (better) | 194 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 28 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 160 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 66.5 kWh (better) | 60 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 155 kW (better) |
| Torque | 375 Nm (better) | 288 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Mercedes-Benz EQA
250

Omoda E5
Knight
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £16,278 | £22,098 |
| Average used price | £18,653 | £23,495 |
| Recent used-price trend | Down 1.2% over ~6 months | Broadly flat |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Omoda E5
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Omoda E5
No active listings.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA costs £10,430 more than the Omoda E5. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Omoda E5 is not just cheaper - it also offers 30 kW faster peak rapid charging and a 0.9s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Omoda E5 comes out ahead overall.
The Omoda E5 is £10,430 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Omoda E5 comes out roughly £10,430 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 219 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 194 miles for the Omoda E5 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mercedes-Benz EQA goes roughly 25 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 28-30 minutes.
The two are within 4 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 570 mm of total clearance for the Omoda E5 and about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQA. The Omoda E5 also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 90% for the Omoda E5. That gives the Omoda E5 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Omoda E5's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Mercedes-Benz EQA's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQA comparisons
More Omoda E5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideBuying a used Mercedes-Benz EQA: the 250, 250+ and 4MATIC versions, realistic range, the software recalls, what owners report and what to pay in 2026.
GuideA used Omoda E5 buyer’s guide: the 2024-25 car vs the 2026 update with faster charging, the wheel hub nut recall, the 7-year warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .