Land Rover Range Rover LWB vs Peugeot e-Rifter

The Land Rover Range Rover LWB costs £183,100 more than the Peugeot e-Rifter. For that premium it adds 173 miles more WLTP range, 250 kW faster peak rapid charging and 82 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Land Rover Range Rover LWB comes out ahead overall.

The Peugeot e-Rifter is £183,100 cheaper to buy. The Peugeot e-Rifter is cheaper to charge, roughly £176 a year versus £216 for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Peugeot e-Rifter comes out roughly £183,300 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 310 miles for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and 166 miles for the Peugeot e-Rifter - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Land Rover Range Rover LWB goes roughly 144 miles further between charging stops.

The Peugeot e-Rifter is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 126 mm narrower than the Land Rover Range Rover LWB. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 479 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-Rifter and about 353 mm of total clearance for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB. The Peugeot e-Rifter also turns in a 0.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.