In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Kia Niro EV stays competitive across the board.
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Select
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Kia Niro EV2 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 (better) | £34,995 |
| Official range | 259 miles | 288 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 566 L (better) | 475 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min | Not available |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.8 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Kia Niro EV2 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 4,420 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm (better) | 1,825 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,545 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m (better) | 10.6 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare (better) | 575 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Kia Niro EV2 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L (better) | 475 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 43 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Kia Niro EV
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Ford Puma Gen-E Select | Kia Niro EV 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.42m+107mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.82m+20mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | Not available |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.54m-10mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.72m+132mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L (better) | 475L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L | Not available |
| Frunk | 43L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m (better) | 10.6m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg (better) | 1,739kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46.8kWh | 64.8kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 259 mi | 288 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 50kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 (better) | £34,995 |
| Price after EV grant | £26,245 (-£3,750) | £34,995 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2022–2026 |
* Kia Niro EV: Heat pump: an option on the 3 and 4, not available on the 2.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Kia Niro EV2 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 259 miles | 288 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 186 miles | 194 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min | Not available |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 50 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 130 Wh/km (better) | 164 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.8 kWh | 64.8 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Kia Niro EV2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.8 sec (better) |
| Power | 124 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Torque | 290 Nm (better) | 255 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | fwd |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select

Kia Niro EV
2
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Kia Niro EV2 |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £17,999 | £16,530 |
| Average used price | £20,750 | £19,500 |
| Active used listings trackedIndependent UK dealer listings seen in the last 90 days. | 10 listings | 87 listings (better) |
| Recent used-price trend | Down 23.4% over ~6 months | Down 2.5% over ~6 months |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Kia Niro EV2 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years (better) | 7 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
Kia Niro EV
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Kia Niro EV
The Kia Niro EV costs £5,000 more than the Ford Puma Gen-E. For that premium it adds 29 miles more WLTP range. The Ford Puma Gen-E is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 kW faster peak rapid charging, 91 litres more boot space and lower energy use, 130 versus 164 Wh/km. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Puma Gen-E is £5,000 cheaper to buy. The Ford Puma Gen-E is cheaper to charge, roughly £144 a year versus £176 for the Kia Niro EV, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out roughly £5,160 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 194 miles for the Kia Niro EV - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV.
The two are within 20 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E and about 575 mm of total clearance for the Kia Niro EV.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 84% for the Kia Niro EV. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. The Ford Puma Gen-E has the longer battery warranty at 8 years, versus 7 for the Kia Niro EV.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More Kia Niro EV comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Ford Puma Gen-E buyer’s guide: the 43 kWh launch car vs the 2026 46.8 kWh update, real-world range, recalls, warranty left, what to pay and a printable checklist.
A used Kia e-Niro (2019-2022) and Niro EV (2022-on) buyer’s guide: telling them apart, 39 vs 64 kWh, trims, Kia’s 7-year warranty, drivetrain noise, heat pump, recalls, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .