In this comparison, Ford Mustang Mach-E leads on charging speed, while the Nissan ARIYA leads on value for money, motorway range and running costs.
Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if...
Choose the Nissan ARIYA if...
Our take
The Nissan ARIYA leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £50,840 | £37,000 (better) |
| Official range | 292 miles (better) | 250 miles |
| Boot space | 402 L | 466 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 7.5 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,713 mm | 4,595 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,930 mm | 1,850 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,097 mm (better) | 2,172 mm |
| Height | 1,624 mm | 1,660 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m | 11.5 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 470 mm spare | 550 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 997 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 402 L | 466 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1420 L (better) | 1350 L |
| Frunk | 100 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan ARIYA
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Select RWD | Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.71m | 4.59m-118mm |
| Width | 1.93m | 1.85m-80mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.10m | 2.17m+75mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.66m+36mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.98m | 2.77m-209mm |
| Ground Clearance | 116mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 402L | 466L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1420L (better) | 1350L |
| Frunk | 100L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 997mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m | 11.5m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,166kg | 1,917kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 72.6kWh (better) | 63kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 292 mi (better) | 250 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 150kW (better) | 130kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £50,840 | £37,000 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £50,840 (not eligible) | £35,500 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 292 miles (better) | 250 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 210 miles (better) | 209 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 150 kW (better) | 130 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7 kW |
| Energy consumption | 179 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 72.6 kWh (better) | 63 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 7.5 sec |
| Power | 197 kW (better) | 160 kW |
| Torque | 525 Nm (better) | 300 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Select RWD

Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan ARIYA
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan ARIYA
No active listings.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E costs £13,840 more than the Nissan ARIYA. For that premium it adds 42 miles more WLTP range and 37 kW more power. The Nissan ARIYA is not just cheaper - it also offers 64 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Nissan ARIYA comes out ahead overall.
The Nissan ARIYA is £13,840 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Nissan ARIYA comes out roughly £13,960 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 210 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-32 minutes.
The Nissan ARIYA is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 80 mm narrower than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA and about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 84% for the Nissan ARIYA. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Nissan ARIYA's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .