In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on charging speed, while the MINI Countryman leads on value for money, motorway range and running costs.
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
Choose the MINI Countryman if...
Our take
The MINI Countryman leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MINI CountrymanE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 | £33,005 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles | 310 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 460 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 29 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MINI CountrymanE |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,445 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm | 1,843 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm (better) | 2,073 mm |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,635 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11.4 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare | 557 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MINI CountrymanE |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm (better) | 892 mm |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 460 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 1450 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | 1,200 kg (better) |
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | MINI Countryman E |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.45m-23mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.84m-29mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.07m+10mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.64m+5mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.69m-75mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 460L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 1450L |
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm (better) | 892mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11.4m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg (better) | 1,940kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | 1,200kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 65.2kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 310 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 | £33,005 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £29,255 (-£3,750) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
* MINI Countryman: 11 kW AC is standard; 22 kW AC was an option.
* MINI Countryman: Current figure, for cars delivered from April 2026 after an efficiency update. Earlier cars have less range.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MINI CountrymanE |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 310 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 258 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 29 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 65.2 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MINI CountrymanE |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
| Power | 140 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 250 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

MINI Countryman
E
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | MINI CountrymanE |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

MINI Countryman
E
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
MINI Countryman
The Ford Explorer costs £2,180 more than the MINI Countryman. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The MINI Countryman is not just cheaper - it also offers 37 miles more WLTP range and 25 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the MINI Countryman comes out ahead overall.
The MINI Countryman is £2,180 cheaper to buy. The MINI Countryman is cheaper to charge, roughly £144 a year versus £176 for the Ford Explorer, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MINI Countryman comes out roughly £2,340 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 258 miles for the MINI Countryman - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The MINI Countryman goes roughly 75 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-29 minutes.
The two are within 29 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 557 mm of total clearance for the MINI Countryman and about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer. The Ford Explorer also turns in a 0.5 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 84% for the MINI Countryman. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More MINI Countryman comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used MINI Countryman Electric buyer’s guide: the E and SE ALL4, the 2026 range update, the £3,750 grant that makes a new one cheaper than many used ones, recalls, warranty, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .