The Mercedes-Benz EQB was replaced by the Mercedes-Benz GLB in 2026. Compare the Ford Explorer with the Mercedes-Benz GLB
In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on value for money, charging speed and running costs, while the Mercedes-Benz EQB leads on family practicality.
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQB if...
Our take
The Ford Explorer leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 (better) | £52,145 |
| Official range | 273 miles (better) | 257 miles |
| Boot space | 470 L | 495 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 32 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,684 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm | 1,834 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm | 2,020 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,667 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11.7 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare | 566 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 4 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L | 495 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 1410 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | 1,700 kg (better) |
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.68m+216mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.83m-38mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.02m-43mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.67m+37mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.83m+62mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | 170mm-23mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L | 495L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 1410L |
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11.7m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg (better) | 2,105kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | 1,700kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 69.7kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi (better) | 257 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW (better) | 100kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 (better) | £52,145 |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £52,145 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2022–2025 |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles (better) | 257 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 214 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 32 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW (better) | 100 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 66.5 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Standard (better) |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 8 sec |
| Power | 140 kW | 168 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 390 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Mercedes-Benz EQB
300 4MATIC
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2019
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4MATIC |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Mercedes-Benz EQB
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Explorer
No active listings.
Mercedes-Benz EQB
The Mercedes-Benz EQB costs £16,960 more than the Ford Explorer. For that premium it adds 2 more seats (7 versus 5). On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Explorer comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Explorer is £16,960 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Explorer comes out roughly £17,000 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 214 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQB - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mercedes-Benz EQB goes roughly 31 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-32 minutes.
The Mercedes-Benz EQB is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 38 mm narrower than the Ford Explorer. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQB and about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer. The Ford Explorer also turns in a 0.8 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 84% for the Mercedes-Benz EQB. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Mercedes-Benz EQB comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Mercedes EQB buyer’s guide: the seven-seat 300 and 350 4MATIC vs the 2024 250+, the steering software recall, real-world range, the battery warranty, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .