Citroën ë-C4 vs Volvo C40 Recharge

The Volvo C40 Recharge costs £19,640 more than the Citroën ë-C4. For that premium it adds 50 miles more WLTP range, 30 kW faster peak rapid charging and 70 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Citroën ë-C4 comes out ahead overall.

The Citroën ë-C4 is £19,640 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Citroën ë-C4 comes out roughly £19,680 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 161 miles for the Citroën ë-C4 and 227 miles for the Volvo C40 Recharge - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Volvo C40 Recharge goes roughly 66 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-37 minutes.

The Citroën ë-C4 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 63 mm narrower than the Volvo C40 Recharge. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-C4 and about 537 mm of total clearance for the Volvo C40 Recharge. The Citroën ë-C4 also turns in a 0.5 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.

Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Citroën ë-C4 and 84% for the Volvo C40 Recharge. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.