In this comparison, Citroën ë-C4 leads on charging speed, while the Ford Puma Gen-E leads on motorway range, running costs and city driving.
Choose the Citroën ë-C4 if...
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Select
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £28,715 (better) | £29,995 |
| Official range | 222 miles | 259 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 380 L | 566 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 26 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 10 sec | 8 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,355 mm | 4,313 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,800 mm (better) | 1,805 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 1,930 mm |
| Height | 1,520 mm | 1,555 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 10.5 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 600 mm spare (better) | 595 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 786 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 380 L | 566 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1250 L | 1283 L (better) |
| Frunk | 0 L | 43 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Citroën ë-C4
Ford Puma Gen-E
| Specification | Citroën ë-C4 PLUS | Ford Puma Gen-E Select |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.36m | 4.31m-42mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.80m+5mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 1.93m |
| Height | 1.52m | 1.55m+35mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.67m | 2.59m-82mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 157mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 380L | 566L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1250L | 1283L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 43L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 786mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 10.5m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,571kg | 1,563kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 50kWh (better) | 46.8kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 222 mi | 259 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 100kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £28,715 (better) | £29,995 |
| Price after EV grant | £27,215 (-£1,500) | £26,245 (-£3,750) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 222 miles | 259 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 161 miles | 186 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 26 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 100 kW |
| Home AC charging | 7.4 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Energy consumption | 153 Wh/km | 130 Wh/km (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 50 kWh (better) | 46.8 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 10 sec | 8 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW | 124 kW (better) |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 290 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Citroën ë-C4
PLUS
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4PLUS | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
Get a quote
Citroën ë-C4
Ford Puma Gen-E
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Citroën ë-C4
No active listings.
Ford Puma Gen-E
The Ford Puma Gen-E costs £1,280 more than the Citroën ë-C4. For that premium it adds 37 miles more WLTP range, 186 litres more boot space and a 2.0s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out ahead overall.
The Citroën ë-C4 is £1,280 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Citroën ë-C4 comes out roughly £1,160 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 161 miles for the Citroën ë-C4 and 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Ford Puma Gen-E goes roughly 25 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-30 minutes.
The two are within 5 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-C4 and about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E. The Ford Puma Gen-E also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Citroën ë-C4 and 84% for the Ford Puma Gen-E. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Citroën ë-C4 comparisons
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .