In this comparison, Citroën ë-C3 leads on running costs and city driving, while the Mazda MX-30 leads on value for money and family practicality.
Choose the Citroën ë-C3 if...
Choose the Mazda MX-30 if...
Our take
The Mazda MX-30 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C3Urban Range | Mazda MX-30SE-L Lux |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £19,995 (better) | £25,545 |
| Official range | 134 miles (better) | 124 miles |
| Boot space | 310 L | 366 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 36 min | 36 min |
| 0-62 mph | 11.6 sec | 9.7 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C3Urban Range | Mazda MX-30SE-L Lux |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,015 mm | 4,395 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,755 mm (better) | 1,795 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,035 mm |
| Height | 1,577 mm | 1,555 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.6 m | 10.6 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 645 mm spare (better) | 605 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C3Urban Range | Mazda MX-30SE-L Lux |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 310 L | 366 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1171 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 0 kg |
| Specification | Citroën ë-C3 Urban Range | Mazda MX-30 SE-L Lux |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.01m | 4.39m+380mm |
| Width | 1.75m | 1.79m+40mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.04m |
| Height | 1.58m | 1.55m-22mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.54m | 2.65m+115mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 175mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 310L | 366L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1171L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.6m | 10.6m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,413kg (better) | 1,654kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 30kWh | 35.5kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 134 mi (better) | 124 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 30kW | 50kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £19,995 (better) | £25,545 |
| Price after EV grant | £18,495 (-£1,500) | £25,545 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2020–2024 |
* Citroën ë-C3: Euro NCAP crash-safety rating not published. The vehicle has been assessed under the Green NCAP sustainability programme only.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C3Urban Range | Mazda MX-30SE-L Lux |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 134 miles (better) | 124 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 94 miles | 104 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 36 min | 36 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 30 kW | 50 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.4 kW (better) | 6.6 kW |
| Energy consumption | 165 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 29.8 kWh | 30 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C3Urban Range | Mazda MX-30SE-L Lux |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 11.6 sec | 9.7 sec (better) |
| Power | 83 kW | 107 kW (better) |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 271 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Citroën ë-C3
Urban Range

Mazda MX-30
SE-L Lux
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Citroën ë-C3 Urban Range
Euro NCAP crash-safety rating not published. The vehicle has been assessed under the Green NCAP sustainability programme only.
Tested 2020
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C3Urban Range | Mazda MX-30SE-L Lux |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Citroën ë-C3
Mazda MX-30
The Mazda MX-30 costs £5,550 more than the Citroën ë-C3. For that premium it adds 56 litres more boot space and a 1.9s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Mazda MX-30 comes out ahead overall.
The Citroën ë-C3 is £5,550 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £184 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Citroën ë-C3 comes out roughly £5,590 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 94 miles for the Citroën ë-C3 and 104 miles for the Mazda MX-30 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 36-36 minutes.
The Citroën ë-C3 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 40 mm narrower than the Mazda MX-30. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 645 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-C3 and about 605 mm of total clearance for the Mazda MX-30.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Citroën ë-C3 and 84% for the Mazda MX-30. That gives the Citroën ë-C3 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Citroën ë-C3's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Mazda MX-30's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Citroën ë-C3 comparisons
More Mazda MX-30 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .