In this comparison, Citroën ë-Berlingo leads on value for money and family practicality, while the Skoda Epiq leads on motorway range, charging speed and running costs.
Choose the Citroën ë-Berlingo if...
Choose the Skoda Epiq if...
Our take
The Skoda Epiq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £32,490 | £24,950 (better) |
| Official range | 211 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Boot space | 775 L (better) | 475 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 28 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9.9 sec | 9.8 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,403 mm | 4,200 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,848 mm | 1,798 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,844 mm | 1,581 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.8 m | 10.7 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 552 mm spare | 602 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 775 L (better) | 475 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1345 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 25 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,200 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Citroën ë-Berlingo
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Epiq
| Specification | Citroën ë-Berlingo Collection M | Skoda Epiq SE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.40m | 4.20m-203mm |
| Width | 1.85m | 1.80m-50mm |
| Height | 1.84m | 1.58m-263mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.79m | 2.60m-184mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 125mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 775L (better) | 475L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1345L |
| Frunk | Not available | 25L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.8m | 10.68m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,736kg | 1,542kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,200kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 52kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 211 mi (better) | 190 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 90kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £32,490 | £24,950 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £30,990 (-£1,500) | £23,450 (-£1,500) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | MPV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 211 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 145 miles | 158 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 28 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 90 kW |
| Home AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 50.7 kWh (better) | 37 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9.9 sec | 9.8 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW (better) | 99 kW |
| Torque | 270 Nm (better) | 267 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Citroën ë-Berlingo
Collection M

Skoda Epiq
SE L 40
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2018
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Citroën ë-Berlingo
Skoda Epiq
The Citroën ë-Berlingo costs £7,540 more than the Skoda Epiq. For that premium it adds 300 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Epiq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Epiq is £7,540 cheaper to buy. The Skoda Epiq is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £168 for the Citroën ë-Berlingo, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Epiq comes out roughly £7,700 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 145 miles for the Citroën ë-Berlingo and 158 miles for the Skoda Epiq - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV.
The Skoda Epiq is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 50 mm narrower than the Citroën ë-Berlingo. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 602 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Epiq and about 552 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-Berlingo.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Citroën ë-Berlingo and 90% for the Skoda Epiq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use LFP-type cells, which are happy charged to 100% every day.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Citroën ë-Berlingo comparisons
More Skoda Epiq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .