In this comparison, Citroën ë-Berlingo leads on city driving, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the Citroën ë-Berlingo if...
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
SE L 60
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £32,490 (better) | £39,010 |
| Official range | 211 miles | 269 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 775 L (better) | 585 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9.9 sec | 8.1 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,403 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,848 mm (better) | 1,879 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,844 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.8 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 552 mm spare (better) | 521 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 775 L (better) | 585 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1710 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,000 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Citroën ë-Berlingo
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Citroën ë-Berlingo Collection M | Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.40m | 4.66m+255mm |
| Width | 1.85m | 1.88m+31mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.15m |
| Height | 1.84m | 1.62m-222mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.79m | 2.77m-19mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 775L (better) | 585L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1710L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.8m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,736kg (better) | 2,084kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 52kWh | 63kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 211 mi | 269 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 165kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £32,490 (better) | £39,010 |
| Price after EV grant | £30,990 (-£1,500) (better) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | MPV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 211 miles | 269 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 145 miles | 224 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 165 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 50.7 kWh | 59 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9.9 sec | 8.1 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 310 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Citroën ë-Berlingo
Collection M

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2018
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Citroën ë-BerlingoCollection M | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Citroën ë-Berlingo
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq costs £6,520 more than the Citroën ë-Berlingo. For that premium it adds 58 miles more WLTP range, 65 kW faster peak rapid charging and 50 kW more power. The Citroën ë-Berlingo is not just cheaper - it also offers 190 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
The Citroën ë-Berlingo is £6,520 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Citroën ë-Berlingo comes out roughly £6,480 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 145 miles for the Citroën ë-Berlingo and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 79 miles further between charging stops.
The Citroën ë-Berlingo is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 31 mm narrower than the Skoda Enyaq. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 552 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-Berlingo and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.5 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Citroën ë-Berlingo and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That gives the Citroën ë-Berlingo a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Citroën ë-Berlingo's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Skoda Enyaq's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Citroën ë-Berlingo comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .