In this comparison, BYD ATTO 3 leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Kia Soul EV leads on city driving.
Choose the BYD ATTO 3 if...
Choose the Kia Soul EV if...
Our take
The BYD ATTO 3 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
EVO Design RWD
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Kia Soul EV64kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £38,990 | £37,295 (better) |
| Official range | 317 miles (better) | 281 miles |
| Boot space | 440 L (better) | 315 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min (better) | 47 min |
| 0-62 mph | 5.5 sec (better) | 7.9 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Kia Soul EV64kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,455 mm | 4,195 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,875 mm | 1,800 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,075 mm | 2,040 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,615 mm | 1,600 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m (better) | 10.6 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 525 mm spare | 600 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Kia Soul EV64kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 440 L (better) | 315 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1338 L | 1339 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
BYD ATTO 3
Kia Soul EV
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | BYD ATTO 3 EVO Design RWD | Kia Soul EV 64kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.20m-260mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.80m-75mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.08m | 2.04m-35mm |
| Height | 1.61m | 1.60m-15mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.72m | 2.60m-120mm |
| Ground Clearance | 180mm | 160mm-20mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 440L (better) | 315L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1338L | 1339L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m (better) | 10.6m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,750kg (better) | 1,758kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 74.8kWh (better) | 67.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 317 mi (better) | 281 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 220kW (better) | 100kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £38,990 | £37,295 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2020–2024 |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Kia Soul EV64kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 317 miles (better) | 281 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 263 miles (better) | 234 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min (better) | 47 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 220 kW (better) | 100 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7.2 kW |
| Energy consumption | 147 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 74.8 kWh (better) | 64 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Kia Soul EV64kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 5.5 sec (better) | 7.9 sec |
| Power | 230 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 395 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

BYD ATTO 3
EVO Design RWD

Kia Soul EV
64kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Kia Soul EV64kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years (better) | 7 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 250,000 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
BYD ATTO 3
Kia Soul EV
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
BYD ATTO 3
No active listings.
Kia Soul EV
The BYD ATTO 3 costs £1,695 more than the Kia Soul EV. For that premium it adds 36 miles more WLTP range, 120 kW faster peak rapid charging and 125 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the BYD ATTO 3 comes out ahead overall.
The Kia Soul EV is £1,695 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Kia Soul EV comes out roughly £1,695 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 263 miles for the BYD ATTO 3 and 234 miles for the Kia Soul EV - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The BYD ATTO 3 goes roughly 29 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 35 minutes in the BYD ATTO 3 and 47 in the Kia Soul EV, so the BYD ATTO 3 loses less time at each stop. That makes the BYD ATTO 3 the stronger long-distance car.
The Kia Soul EV is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 75 mm narrower than the BYD ATTO 3. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Kia Soul EV and about 525 mm of total clearance for the BYD ATTO 3.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the BYD ATTO 3 and 84% for the Kia Soul EV. That gives the BYD ATTO 3 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The BYD ATTO 3's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Kia Soul EV's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. The BYD ATTO 3 has the longer battery warranty at 8 years, versus 7 for the Kia Soul EV.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BYD ATTO 3 comparisons
More Kia Soul EV comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used BYD Atto 3 buyer’s guide: the original 60 kWh car vs the 2026 Atto 3 EVO, BYD’s long warranty, slow rapid charging, insurance, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Kia Soul EV buyer’s guide: the 2014-2019 car vs the 64 kWh e-Soul, battery wear on early cars, the 7-year warranty, the recalls, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .