In this comparison, Audi e-tron GT leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E leads on family practicality.
Choose the Audi e-tron GT if...
Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if...
Our take
The Audi e-tron GT wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
quattro
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £89,555 | £50,840 (better) |
| Official range | 385 miles (better) | 292 miles |
| Boot space | 405 L (better) | 402 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 18 min (better) | 32 min |
| 0-62 mph | 4 sec (better) | 6.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,989 mm | 4,713 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,964 mm | 1,930 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,158 mm | 2,097 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,396 mm | 1,624 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m | 11.6 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 436 mm spare | 470 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 997 mm |
| Boot space (seats up) | 405 L (better) | 402 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1420 L |
| Frunk | 85 L | 100 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi e-tron GT
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
| Specification | Audi e-tron GT quattro | Ford Mustang Mach-E Select RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.99m | 4.71m-276mm |
| Width | 1.96m | 1.93m-34mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.16m | 2.10m-61mm |
| Height | 1.40m | 1.62m+228mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.90m | 2.98m+84mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 116mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 405L (better) | 402L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1420L |
| Frunk | 85L | 100L (better) |
| Seats | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 997mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m | 11.6m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,340kg | 2,166kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 105kWh (better) | 72.6kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 385 mi (better) | 292 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 320kW (better) | 150kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £89,555 | £50,840 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Coupe | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2024+ |
* Audi e-tron GT: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 385 miles (better) | 292 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 321 miles (better) | 210 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 18 min (better) | 32 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 320 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 179 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 105 kWh (better) | 72.6 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 800V (better) | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 4 sec (better) | 6.7 sec |
| Power | 429 kW (better) | 197 kW |
| Torque | 590 Nm (better) | 525 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Audi e-tron GT
quattro

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Select RWD
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Audi e-tron GT quattro
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Audi e-tron GT
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi e-tron GT
No active listings.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Audi e-tron GT costs £38,715 more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. For that premium it adds 93 miles more WLTP range, 170 kW faster peak rapid charging and 232 kW more power. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is not just cheaper - it also offers 1 more seat (5 versus 4). On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi e-tron GT comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is £38,715 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £184 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out roughly £38,675 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 321 miles for the Audi e-tron GT and 210 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Audi e-tron GT goes roughly 111 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 18 minutes in the Audi e-tron GT and 32 in the Ford Mustang Mach-E, so the Audi e-tron GT loses less time at each stop. That makes the Audi e-tron GT the stronger long-distance car.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 34 mm narrower than the Audi e-tron GT. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and about 436 mm of total clearance for the Audi e-tron GT.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi e-tron GT and 90% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Audi e-tron GT's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi e-tron GT comparisons
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .