In this comparison, Nissan ARIYA stays competitive across the board, while the Skoda Elroq leads on value for money, running costs and city driving.
Choose the Skoda Elroq if...
Our take
The Skoda Elroq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Engage+ 63kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £37,000 | £33,970 (better) |
| Official range | 250 miles | 280 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 466 L | 470 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | Not available |
| 0-62 mph | 7.5 sec (better) | 8.5 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,595 mm | 4,488 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,850 mm (better) | 1,884 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,172 mm | 2,148 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,660 mm | 1,625 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.5 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 550 mm spare (better) | 516 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 466 L | 470 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1350 L | 1580 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg (better) | 0 kg |
| Specification | Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh | Skoda Elroq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.49m-107mm |
| Width | 1.85m | 1.88m+34mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.17m | 2.15m-24mm |
| Height | 1.66m | 1.63m-35mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.77m-10mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 466L | 470L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1350L | 1580L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.5m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,917kg (better) | 2,457kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg (better) | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh (better) | 61kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 250 mi | 280 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 130kW (better) | 105kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £37,000 | £33,970 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £35,500 (-£1,500) | £32,470 (-£1,500) (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 250 miles | 280 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 209 miles | 234 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | Not available |
| Max rapid charge rate | 130 kW (better) | 105 kW |
| Home AC charging | 7 kW | 7.2 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 63 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.5 sec (better) | 8.5 sec |
| Power | 160 kW (better) | 140 kW |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 310 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Skoda Elroq
SE L 60
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Skoda ElroqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Nissan ARIYA
Skoda Elroq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Nissan ARIYA
No active listings.
Skoda Elroq
The Nissan ARIYA costs £3,030 more than the Skoda Elroq. For that premium it adds 25 kW faster peak rapid charging and a 1.0s quicker 0-62mph time. The Skoda Elroq is not just cheaper - it also offers 30 miles more WLTP range. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Elroq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Elroq is £3,030 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Elroq comes out roughly £3,110 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA and 234 miles for the Skoda Elroq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Elroq goes roughly 25 miles further between charging stops.
The Nissan ARIYA is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 34 mm narrower than the Skoda Elroq. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA and about 516 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Elroq. The Skoda Elroq also turns in a 2.2 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Nissan ARIYA and 84% for the Skoda Elroq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
More Skoda Elroq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Nissan Ariya buyer’s guide: 63 vs 87 kWh, two-wheel drive vs e-4ORCE and Nismo, the motor and inverter recalls, 12-volt battery problems, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay vs a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Skoda Elroq buyer’s guide: 50, 60, 85 and vRS explained, the April 2026 battery change, warranty, real-world range, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .