In this comparison, Mazda 6e leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Smart #3 leads on city driving.
Choose the Mazda 6e if...
Choose the Smart #3 if...
Our take
The Mazda 6e wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Specification | Mazda 6e Takumi | Smart #3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.92m | 4.40m-521mm |
| Width | 1.89m | 1.84m-46mm |
| Height | 1.49m | 1.56m+65mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.90m | 2.79m-110mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 336L | 370L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1160L |
| Frunk | 72L (better) | 15L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m | Not available |
| Kerb Weight | 2,027kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 78kWh (better) | 66kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 348 mi (better) | 202 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 195kW (better) | 150kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £38,995 | £33,960 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Saloon | Coupe |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Smart #3Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 348 miles (better) | 202 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 290 miles (better) | 189 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 24 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 195 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7.4 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 172 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 78 kWh (better) | 66 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Mazda 6e
Takumi

Smart #3
Pro
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
Get a quote
Mazda 6e
Smart #3
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mazda 6e
No active listings.
Smart #3
The Mazda 6e costs £5,035 more than the Smart #3. For that premium it adds 146 miles more WLTP range and 45 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Smart #3 is not just cheaper - it also offers a 2.1s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Mazda 6e comes out ahead overall.
The Smart #3 is £5,035 cheaper to buy. The Mazda 6e is cheaper to charge, roughly £152 a year versus £192 for the Smart #3, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Smart #3 comes out roughly £4,835 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 290 miles for the Mazda 6e and 189 miles for the Smart #3 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mazda 6e goes roughly 101 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-30 minutes.
The Smart #3 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 46 mm narrower than the Mazda 6e. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 556 mm of total clearance for the Smart #3 and about 510 mm of total clearance for the Mazda 6e.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Mazda 6e and 84% for the Smart #3. That gives the Mazda 6e a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Mazda 6e's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Smart #3's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mazda 6e comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .