In this comparison, Land Rover Range Rover LWB leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Mercedes-Benz EQV counters with the lowest price.
Best value
Land Rover Range Rover LWBRange & charging
Land Rover Range Rover LWBPracticality
Land Rover Range Rover LWBChoose the Land Rover Range Rover LWB if...
Our take
The Land Rover Range Rover LWB wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQV300 Long |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £215,670 | £92,265 (better) |
| Official range | 372 miles (better) | 222 miles |
| Boot space | 857 L | 1030 L (better) |
| 0-62 mph | Not available | 12.1 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQV300 Long |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5,252 mm | 5,140 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 2,047 mm | 1,928 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,870 mm | 1,890 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.5 m (better) | 11.8 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 353 mm spare | 472 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQV300 Long |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Boot space (seats up) | 857 L | 1030 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 2175 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 2,500 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
Mercedes-Benz EQV
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Land Rover Range Rover LWB SV | Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 Long |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5.25m | 5.14m-112mm |
| Width | 2.05m | 1.93m-119mm |
| Height | 1.87m | 1.89m+20mm |
| Wheelbase | 3.20m | 3.20m+3mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 857L* | 1030L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 2175L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.54m (better) | 11.8m |
| Kerb Weight | Not available | 2,630kg |
| Towing Capacity | 2,500kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 118.5kWh (better) | 90kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 372 mi (better) | 222 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 350kW (better) | 110kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £215,670 | £92,265 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | suv | MPV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Inferred from the ICE Range Rover LWB (5-seat); not yet confirmed for the EV, which may differ slightly due to battery packaging.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources; shares the ICE Range Rover body shell.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources reporting the long-wheelbase Range Rover Electric; matches the ICE Range Rover LWB body shell.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources; shares the ICE Range Rover LWB platform.
* Mercedes-Benz EQV: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQV300 Long |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 372 miles (better) | 222 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 310 miles (better) | 185 miles |
| Max rapid charge rate | 350 kW (better) | 110 kW |
| Home AC charging | Not available | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 118.5 kWh (better) | 90 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | Not available | NMC |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQV300 Long |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | Not available | 12.1 sec |
| Power | Not available | 150 kW |
| Torque | Not available | 362 Nm |
| Drivetrain | Not available | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Land Rover Range Rover LWB
SV
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Mercedes-Benz EQV
300 Long
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 Long
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Get a quote
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
Mercedes-Benz EQV
The Land Rover Range Rover LWB costs £123,405 more than the Mercedes-Benz EQV. For that premium it adds 150 miles more WLTP range and 240 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Mercedes-Benz EQV is not just cheaper - it also offers 173 litres more boot space and 3 more seats (8 versus 5). On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Land Rover Range Rover LWB comes out ahead overall.
The Mercedes-Benz EQV is £123,405 cheaper to buy. The Land Rover Range Rover LWB is cheaper to charge, roughly £216 a year versus £272 for the Mercedes-Benz EQV, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Mercedes-Benz EQV comes out roughly £123,125 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 310 miles for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and 185 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQV - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Land Rover Range Rover LWB goes roughly 125 miles further between charging stops.
The Mercedes-Benz EQV is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 119 mm narrower than the Land Rover Range Rover LWB. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 472 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQV and about 353 mm of total clearance for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Land Rover Range Rover LWB comparisons
More Mercedes-Benz EQV comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .