In this comparison, Hyundai KONA Electric leads on family practicality, while the Skoda Epiq leads on motorway range and charging speed.
Choose the Hyundai KONA Electric (2018-2023) if...
Choose the Skoda Epiq if...
Our take
The Skoda Epiq edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
SE L 40
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,495 | £24,950 (better) |
| Official range | 190 miles | 190 miles |
| Boot space | 332 L | 475 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 48 min | 28 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 9.9 sec | 9.8 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,205 mm | 4,200 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,800 mm | 1,798 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,070 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,570 mm | 1,581 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m (better) | 10.7 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 600 mm spare | 602 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 332 L | 475 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1114 L | 1345 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 25 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,200 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Hyundai KONA Electric
Skoda Epiq
| Specification | Hyundai KONA Electric 39kWh | Skoda Epiq SE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.21m | 4.20m-5mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.80m-2mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.07m | Not available |
| Height | 1.57m | 1.58m+11mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.60m | 2.60m+1mm |
| Ground Clearance | 170mm | 125mm-45mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 332L | 475L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1114L | 1345L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 25L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m (better) | 10.68m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,535kg (better) | 1,542kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,200kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 39.2kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 190 mi | 190 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 44kW | 90kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,495 | £24,950 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £29,495 (not eligible) | £23,450 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2018–2020 | 2026+ |
* Hyundai KONA Electric: Heat pump: an option on every trim, not standard.
* Hyundai KONA Electric: Manufacturer lists no towing capacity for the 39 kWh car.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 190 miles | 190 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 158 miles | 158 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 48 min | 28 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 44 kW | 90 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.2 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 36 kWh | 37 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9.9 sec | 9.8 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW (better) | 99 kW |
| Torque | 395 Nm (better) | 267 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2017
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | Skoda EpiqSE L 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Hyundai KONA Electric
Skoda Epiq
The Hyundai KONA Electric costs £4,545 more than the Skoda Epiq. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Skoda Epiq is not just cheaper - it also offers 46 kW faster peak rapid charging and 143 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Epiq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Epiq is £4,545 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £136 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Epiq comes out roughly £4,585 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 158 miles for the Hyundai KONA Electric and 158 miles for the Skoda Epiq - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 48 minutes in the Hyundai KONA Electric and 28 in the Skoda Epiq, so the Skoda Epiq loses less time at each stop.
The two are within 2 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 602 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Epiq and about 600 mm of total clearance for the Hyundai KONA Electric.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 86% battery health for the Hyundai KONA Electric and 90% for the Skoda Epiq. That gives the Skoda Epiq a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Skoda Epiq's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Hyundai KONA Electric's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Hyundai KONA Electric comparisons
More Skoda Epiq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .