In this comparison, Hyundai KONA Electric leads on family practicality, while the MINI Aceman leads on motorway range.
Choose the Hyundai KONA Electric (2018-2023) if...
Choose the MINI Aceman if...
Our take
The MINI Aceman edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
E
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,495 | £28,310 (better) |
| Official range | 190 miles | 191 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 332 L (better) | 300 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 48 min | 29 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 9.9 sec (better) | 12.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,205 mm | 4,079 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,800 mm | 1,754 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,070 mm | 1,984 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,570 mm | 1,514 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m (better) | 10.8 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 600 mm spare | 646 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 822 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 332 L (better) | 300 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1114 L (better) | 1005 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Hyundai KONA Electric
MINI Aceman
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Hyundai KONA Electric 39kWh | MINI Aceman E |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.21m | 4.08m-126mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.75m-46mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.07m | 1.98m-86mm |
| Height | 1.57m | 1.51m-56mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.60m | 2.61m+6mm |
| Ground Clearance | 170mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 332L (better) | 300L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1114L (better) | 1005L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 822mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m (better) | 10.8m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,535kg (better) | 1,720kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 39.2kWh (better) | 38.5kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 190 mi | 191 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 44kW | 75kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,495 | £28,310 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2018–2020 | 2024+ |
* Hyundai KONA Electric: Heat pump: an option on every trim, not standard.
* Hyundai KONA Electric: Manufacturer lists no towing capacity for the 39 kWh car.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 190 miles | 191 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 158 miles | 159 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 48 min | 29 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 44 kW | 75 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.2 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 36 kWh | 38.5 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9.9 sec (better) | 12.7 sec |
| Power | 100 kW | 135 kW (better) |
| Torque | 395 Nm (better) | 290 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Hyundai KONA Electric
39kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

MINI Aceman
E
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2017
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Hyundai KONA Electric39kWh | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Hyundai KONA Electric
MINI Aceman
The Hyundai KONA Electric costs £1,185 more than the MINI Aceman. For that premium it adds a 2.8s quicker 0-62mph time. The MINI Aceman is not just cheaper - it also offers 31 kW faster peak rapid charging and 35 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the MINI Aceman comes out ahead overall.
The MINI Aceman is £1,185 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £136 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MINI Aceman comes out roughly £1,225 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 158 miles for the Hyundai KONA Electric and 159 miles for the MINI Aceman - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 48 minutes in the Hyundai KONA Electric and 29 in the MINI Aceman, so the MINI Aceman loses less time at each stop.
The MINI Aceman is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 46 mm narrower than the Hyundai KONA Electric. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 646 mm of total clearance for the MINI Aceman and about 600 mm of total clearance for the Hyundai KONA Electric. The Hyundai KONA Electric also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 86% battery health for the Hyundai KONA Electric and 84% for the MINI Aceman. That gives the Hyundai KONA Electric a modest edge in retained real-world range. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Hyundai KONA Electric comparisons
More MINI Aceman comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .