In this comparison, Honda e leads on city driving, while the MINI Aceman leads on value for money, motorway range and running costs.
Choose the Honda e if...
Choose the MINI Aceman if...
Our take
The MINI Aceman leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
E
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Honda eBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £30,715 | £28,310 (better) |
| Official range | 138 miles | 191 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 171 L | 300 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 31 min | 29 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec (better) | 12.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Honda eBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3,894 mm | 4,079 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,752 mm (better) | 1,754 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,895 mm (better) | 1,984 mm |
| Height | 1,512 mm | 1,514 mm |
| Turning circle | 8.6 m (better) | 10.8 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 648 mm spare (better) | 646 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Honda eBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 822 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 171 L | 300 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 861 L | 1005 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
| Specification | Honda e Base | MINI Aceman E |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 3.89m | 4.08m+185mm |
| Width | 1.75m | 1.75m+2mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.90m | 1.98m+89mm |
| Height | 1.51m | 1.51m+2mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.54m | 2.61m+68mm |
| Ground Clearance | 145mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 171L | 300L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 861L | 1005L (better) |
| Seats | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 822mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 8.6m (better) | 10.8m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,543kg (better) | 1,720kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 35.5kWh | 38.5kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 138 mi | 191 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 56kW | 75kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £30,715 | £28,310 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2020–2024 | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Honda eBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 138 miles | 191 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 115 miles | 159 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 31 min | 29 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 56 kW | 75 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 6.6 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 28.9 kWh | 38.5 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Honda eBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec (better) | 12.7 sec |
| Power | 100 kW | 135 kW (better) |
| Torque | 315 Nm (better) | 290 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Honda e
Base

MINI Aceman
E
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2020
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Honda eBase | MINI AcemanE |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Honda e
MINI Aceman
The Honda e costs £2,405 more than the MINI Aceman. For that premium it adds a 3.7s quicker 0-62mph time. The MINI Aceman is not just cheaper - it also offers 53 miles more WLTP range, 129 litres more boot space and 35 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the MINI Aceman comes out ahead overall.
The MINI Aceman is £2,405 cheaper to buy. The MINI Aceman is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £176 for the Honda e, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MINI Aceman comes out roughly £2,605 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 115 miles for the Honda e and 159 miles for the MINI Aceman - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The MINI Aceman goes roughly 44 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 29-31 minutes.
The two are within 2 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 648 mm of total clearance for the Honda e and about 646 mm of total clearance for the MINI Aceman. The Honda e also turns in a 2.2 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Honda e and 84% for the MINI Aceman. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Honda e comparisons
More MINI Aceman comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .