In this comparison, Ford Mustang Mach-E counters with the lowest price, while the Volvo EX90 leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the Volvo EX90 if...
Our take
The Volvo EX90 wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Select RWD
Single Motor
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £50,840 (better) | £80,160 |
| Official range | 292 miles | 351 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 402 L (better) | 324 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min | 22 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 6.8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,713 mm | 5,037 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,930 mm (better) | 1,964 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,097 mm (better) | 2,113 mm |
| Height | 1,624 mm | 1,744 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m (better) | 12 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 470 mm spare (better) | 436 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear legroom | 997 mm (better) | 926 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 402 L (better) | 324 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1420 L | 2082 L (better) |
| Frunk | 100 L (better) | 46 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,500 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX90
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Select RWD | Volvo EX90 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.71m | 5.04m+324mm |
| Width | 1.93m | 1.96m+34mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.10m | 2.11m+16mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.74m+120mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.98m | 2.98m+1mm |
| Ground Clearance | 116mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 402L (better) | 324L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1420L | 2082L (better) |
| Frunk | 100L (better) | 46L |
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear Legroom | 997mm (better) | 926mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m (better) | 12m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,166kg (better) | 2,555kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,500kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 72.6kWh | 92kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 292 mi | 351 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 150kW | 350kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £50,840 (better) | £80,160 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 292 miles | 351 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 210 miles | 246 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min | 22 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 150 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 179 Wh/km (better) | 185 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 72.6 kWh | 88 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 800V (better) |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 6.8 sec |
| Power | 197 kW | 245 kW (better) |
| Torque | 525 Nm (better) | 480 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Select RWD

Volvo EX90
Single Motor
7.7/10
average across 5 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo EX90Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX90
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo EX90
No active listings.
The Volvo EX90 costs £29,320 more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. For that premium it adds 59 miles more WLTP range, 200 kW faster peak rapid charging and 48 kW more power. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is not just cheaper - it also offers 78 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Volvo EX90 comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is £29,320 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £192 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out roughly £29,360 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 210 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 246 miles for the Volvo EX90 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Volvo EX90 goes roughly 36 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 32 minutes in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 22 in the Volvo EX90, so the Volvo EX90 loses less time at each stop. That makes the Volvo EX90 the stronger long-distance car.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 34 mm narrower than the Volvo EX90. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and about 436 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EX90. The Ford Mustang Mach-E also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 84% for the Volvo EX90. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Volvo EX90's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
More Volvo EX90 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .