In this comparison, Ford Mustang Mach-E stays competitive across the board, while the Toyota bZ4X leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed.
Choose the Toyota bZ4X if...
Our take
The Toyota bZ4X wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Icon FWD 57.7kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £50,840 | £39,995 (better) |
| Official range | 292 miles (better) | 276 miles |
| Boot space | 402 L | 452 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,713 mm | 4,690 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,930 mm | 1,860 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,097 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,624 mm | 1,650 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m | 11.2 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 470 mm spare | 540 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 997 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 402 L | 452 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1420 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 100 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota bZ4X
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Select RWD | Toyota bZ4X Icon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.71m | 4.69m-23mm |
| Width | 1.93m | 1.86m-70mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.10m | Not available |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.65m+26mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.98m | 2.85m-134mm |
| Ground Clearance | 116mm | 177mm+61mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 402L | 452L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1420L | Not available |
| Frunk | 100L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 997mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m | 11.2m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,166kg | 1,870kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 72.6kWh (better) | 57.7kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 292 mi (better) | 276 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 150kW | 150kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £50,840 | £39,995 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 292 miles (better) | 276 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 210 miles | 230 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 150 kW | 150 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 179 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 72.6 kWh (better) | 54 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
| Power | 197 kW (better) | 125 kW |
| Torque | 525 Nm (better) | 269 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Select RWD

Toyota bZ4X
Icon FWD 57.7kWh
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota bZ4X
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota bZ4X
No active listings.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E costs £10,845 more than the Toyota bZ4X. For that premium it adds 72 kW more power and a 1.9s quicker 0-62mph time. The Toyota bZ4X is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota bZ4X comes out ahead overall.
The Toyota bZ4X is £10,845 cheaper to buy. The Toyota bZ4X is cheaper to charge, roughly £144 a year versus £192 for the Ford Mustang Mach-E, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Toyota bZ4X comes out roughly £11,085 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 210 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 230 miles for the Toyota bZ4X - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota bZ4X goes roughly 20 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-32 minutes.
The Toyota bZ4X is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 70 mm narrower than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 540 mm of total clearance for the Toyota bZ4X and about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The Toyota bZ4X also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 84% for the Toyota bZ4X. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Toyota bZ4X's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
More Toyota bZ4X comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .