In this comparison, Ford Mustang Mach-E leads on value for money, family practicality and charging speed, while the Tesla Model S stays competitive across the board.
Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if...
Our take
The Ford Mustang Mach-E wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Select RWD
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Tesla Model S75D |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £50,840 (better) | £75,850 |
| Official range | 292 miles (better) | 259 miles |
| Boot space | 402 L | 745 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min (better) | 40 min |
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec | 5.5 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Tesla Model S75D |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,713 mm | 4,979 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,930 mm (better) | 1,964 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,097 mm (better) | 2,189 mm |
| Height | 1,624 mm | 1,445 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m (better) | 11.8 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 470 mm spare (better) | 436 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Tesla Model S75D |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 997 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 402 L | 745 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1420 L | 1645 L (better) |
| Frunk | 100 L | 150 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model S
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Select RWD | Tesla Model S 75D |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.71m | 4.98m+266mm |
| Width | 1.93m | 1.96m+34mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.10m | 2.19m+92mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.45m-179mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.98m | 2.96m-24mm |
| Ground Clearance | 116mm | 137mm+21mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 402L | 745L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1420L | 1645L (better) |
| Frunk | 100L | 150L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 997mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m (better) | 11.8m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,166kg | 2,108kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 72.6kWh | 75kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 292 mi (better) | 259 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 150kW (better) | 120kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £50,840 (better) | £75,850 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Saloon |
| Available | 2024+ | 2016–2019 |
* Tesla Model S: NEDC-era estimate — official WLTP not published for this variant
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Tesla Model S75D |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 292 miles (better) | 259 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 210 miles (better) | 198 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min (better) | 40 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 150 kW (better) | 120 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 179 Wh/km (better) | 190 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 72.6 kWh (better) | 72.5 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NCA |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard (better) | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Tesla Model S75D |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec | 5.5 sec (better) |
| Power | 197 kW | 283 kW (better) |
| Torque | 525 Nm (better) | 430 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Select RWD

Tesla Model S
75D
7.8/10
average across 5 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Tesla Model S75D |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £21,905 | £10,566 |
| Average used price | £24,497 | £14,565 |
| Active used listings trackedIndependent UK dealer listings seen in the last 90 days. | 10 listings | 25 listings (better) |
| Recent used-price trend | Down 18% over ~6 months | Up 100.3% over ~6 months |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2014
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Tesla Model S75D |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 240,000 km (better) |
Get a quote
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model S
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model S
The Tesla Model S costs £25,010 more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. For that premium it adds 343 litres more boot space, 86 kW more power and a 1.2s quicker 0-62mph time. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is not just cheaper - it also offers 33 miles more WLTP range and 30 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is £25,010 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £192 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out roughly £25,090 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 210 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 198 miles for the Tesla Model S - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 32 minutes in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 40 in the Tesla Model S, so the Ford Mustang Mach-E loses less time at each stop.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 34 mm narrower than the Tesla Model S. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and about 436 mm of total clearance for the Tesla Model S.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 85% for the Tesla Model S. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Tesla Model S's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
More Tesla Model S comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .