Ford E-Tourneo Courier vs Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq costs £5,320 more than the Ford E-Tourneo Courier. For that premium it adds 73 miles more WLTP range, 65 kW faster peak rapid charging and 50 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.

The Ford E-Tourneo Courier is £5,320 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford E-Tourneo Courier comes out roughly £5,320 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 163 miles for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 61 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 35 minutes in the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 24 in the Skoda Enyaq, so the Skoda Enyaq loses less time at each stop. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the stronger long-distance car.

The two are within 3 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 524 mm of total clearance for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.

Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford E-Tourneo Courier and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.